Yap, the best thing you can do there is have a "cache" of the used keys.
- Original Message -
From: "Arshad Noor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: Improve performance of XML Signing
> It appears that opening th
mlSig.addKeyInfo(cert);
xmlSig.addKeyInfo(cert.getPublicKey());
//System.out.println("AFTER calling");
xmlSig.sign(privateKey);
-----Original Message-
From: Arshad Noor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:34 PM
To: security
w to improve the performance in this area.
Thanks
Murugan
-Original Message-
From: Arshad Noor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 6:25 PM
To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improve performance of XML Signing
Murugan,
Characterization requires that yo
I also recommed that you look at vtd-XmL
http://vtd-xml.sf.net...
- Original Message -
From: "Arshad Noor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: Improve performance of XML Signing
Have you characterized the performance o
tem.out.println("AFTER calling");
xmlSig.sign(privateKey);
-Original Message-
From: Arshad Noor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:34 PM
To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improve performance of XML Signing
Have you charact
ddKeyInfo(cert);
xmlSig.addKeyInfo(cert.getPublicKey());
//System.out.println("AFTER calling");
xmlSig.sign(privateKey);
-Original Message-
From: Arshad Noor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:34 PM
To: sec
Have you characterized the performance of the end-to-end transaction
to determine where your bottle-necks are? Without that you're shooting
in the dark - i.e. you could spend a lot of time optimizing components
of the process and still not a dent in the overall signing time.
Arshad Noor
StrongAu
Hi All,
We are trying to improve the performance of the XML signing
done using apache tool kit.Can any one help and guide me on improving the
performance of the signing
Help would be appreciated!!!
Thanks
Murugan
