Added a Bugzilla Bug - http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26660
thanks,
dims
--- Dittmann Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> attached a patch to XMLCipher. It is the same
> patch as posted January, 5th with one slight modification.
>
> This code now _always_ gets a C14n
All,
attached a patch to XMLCipher. It is the same
patch as posted January, 5th with one slight modification.
This code now _always_ gets a C14n instance to perform
serialization. It does not use Xerces XMLSerialization
anymore (I didn't delete the code that uses it, its
just not called anymore).
Berin,
No problem at all (waiting for a few days). Hope all's well with you.
-- dims
PS: My son is 4 months old now. So yes, i can understand intrusion :) :) :)
--- Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will do. Apologies - have seen the various questions, but real life has
> been int
Will do. Apologies - have seen the various questions, but real life has
been intruding :>. Will try to get to this in the next few days if
that's cool. If very urgent, come back to me!
Cheers,
Berin
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Berin,
Could you please review and commit these patches? We n
Berin,
Could you please review and commit these patches? We need it for WSS4J to work
properly.
-- dims
--- Dittmann Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> here are some patches for XMLCipher. Fixed problems
> with Content encryption, base64 encoding. Some
> other enhancement such wrong
All,
here are some patches for XMLCipher. Fixed problems
with Content encryption, base64 encoding. Some
other enhancement such wrong coding, enhancement of
Serializer code to include comment, CDATA nodes,
etc. follow the next days.
Regards,
Werner
XMLCipher.patch
Description: Binary data
Ci
