Re: Log4j configuration on Initialisation

2004-04-10 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Jem, I just had a quick look at this. I'd forgotten that Axl migrated all the logging to the commons-logging wrapper API some time back. So 1.1 simply calls on commons logging objects, and the library does no configuration of any logging whatsoever. Whatever you set up with log4j should work

Re: Log4j configuration on Initialisation

2004-04-07 Thread trebor iksrazal
--- Jem Mawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks iksrazal > > So you've reversed the problem by calling Init prior > to initialising the > correct configurator, thereby overwriting the > xml-security configuration > with your own. Is this right? More or less. I prefer to do the xml-security In

Re: Log4j configuration on Initialisation

2004-04-06 Thread Jem Mawson
Thanks iksrazal So you've reversed the problem by calling Init prior to initialising the correct configurator, thereby overwriting the xml-security configuration with your own. Is this right? I still have my doubts about the xml-security library requiring its own log4j configuration. Can anyone c

Re: Log4j configuration on Initialisation

2004-04-06 Thread trebor iksrazal
--- Jem Mawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I note that the Init class performs Log4j > configuration using the > config.xml from within the xml-security.jar. This > has the unfortunate > side-effect of removing any Log4j configuration that > may have been set > from the application con