Re: VOTE: TLP Resolution

2006-06-10 Thread Berin Lautenbach
OK Calling it. Following people voted: Dims, Berin, Werner, Raul, Sean, Ceki, Steve 7 x +1 for TLP. (2 non-binding) 7 x +1 for BL as chair (2 non-binding) 6 x +1 for Santuario (2 non-binding) and 1 for Raksha. So I will take to the XML PMC and then to then board with the TLP project name of

Re: VOTE: TLP Resolution

2006-06-08 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Ceki, Welcome :>. Cheers, Berin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Here are my (non-binding) votes. > > 1) +1 > 2) Santuario > 3) +1 > > Given that my current project will be heavily relying on XML-security > and WS-Security and also as a former cryptography enthusiast, I would > like to de

RE: VOTE: TLP Resolution

2006-06-07 Thread Cullum, Steve
For my part... 1) +1 2) Santuario 3) +1 > Berin Lautenbach wrote: > > All, > > > > I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook. > > > > I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make > > it formal. > > > > All committers need to cast a vote on the following. > > > > 1

Re: VOTE: TLP Resolution

2006-06-07 Thread Davanum Srinivas
woohoo!! welcome ceki! we could sure use all the help we can get. - dims On 6/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here are my (non-binding) votes. 1) +1 2) Santuario 3) +1 Given that my current project will be heavily relying on XML-security and WS-Security and also as a form

Re: VOTE: TLP Resolution

2006-06-07 Thread ceki
Here are my (non-binding) votes. 1) +1 2) Santuario 3) +1 Given that my current project will be heavily relying on XML-security and WS-Security and also as a former cryptography enthusiast, I would like to devote part of my time and energy contributing to XML-security and WS-security projects.

Re: VOTE: TLP Resolution

2006-06-03 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Still need votes from: Erwin van der Koogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Axl Mattheus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vishal Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Milan Tomic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karel Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Noah Levitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Walter Hoehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'll give it another 48 hours then

Re: VOTE: TLP Resolution

2006-05-31 Thread Sean Mullan
1) +1 2) Santuario 3) +1 Berin Lautenbach wrote: All, I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook. I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make it formal. All committers need to cast a vote on the following. 1) Support for going to TLP as a broad Security project

Re: VOTE: TLP Resolution

2006-05-31 Thread Raul Benito
1)+1 2) Santuario 3) +1 On 5/31/06, Dittmann, Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here are my votes: 1) +1 2) Santuario 3) +1 Regards, Werner > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2006 12:22 > An: security-dev@xml.a

Re: VOTE: TLP Resolution

2006-05-31 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Oops - meant to be formal. 1) +1 2) Santuario (I still like it a lot :>) 3) +1 :> Berin Lautenbach wrote: > All, > > I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook. > > I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make it > formal. > > All committers need to cast a vote o

Re: VOTE: TLP Resolution

2006-05-31 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Oops! +1 to Raksha. +1 to Berin as PMC Chair. -- dims On 5/31/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 from me. On 5/31/06, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook. > > I've floated the idea on board@ and got no object

Re: VOTE: TLP Resolution

2006-05-31 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. On 5/31/06, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All, I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook. I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make it formal. All committers need to cast a vote on the following. 1) Support for going to TLP as a bro