Berin,
let's go with just xml-security...
-- dims
On 6/25/06, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK guys, quick poll - is anyone going to get upset if I put forwad two
resolutions to the board, one as original which is preferred and one as
just xml-security as the fallback?
I should
OK guys, quick poll - is anyone going to get upset if I put forwad two
resolutions to the board, one as original which is preferred and one as
just xml-security as the fallback?
I should have realised that creating a broad project might get sticky -
my apologies to all. I'm still going to push fo
I'd suggest simply moving XML-Security to a TLP and not worry about it
needing to have a broader role. There is no problem with a "small"
TLP.
I think any sort of "security federation" would be handled similarly
to the site-dev mailing list and its care/feeding of www.apache.org.
(and I might eve
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Any given problem at Apache can be solved at least a dozen different
> ways, satisfying different sets of consumers, and reaching independent
> levels of perfections in the minds of their own designers. We should
> not fear internal competition.
>
> A federation is sim
On Jun 22, 2006, at 3:01 AM, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
It sounds like a decent idea for a federation, but a terrible idea
for a project. Projects need to be responsible for a product or they
just end up in the weeds. A federation of projects can simply
maintain
a gene
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> It sounds like a decent idea for a federation, but a terrible idea
> for a project. Projects need to be responsible for a product or they
> just end up in the weeds. A federation of projects can simply maintain
> a general mailing list and website.
It would be responsib
It sounds like a decent idea for a federation, but a terrible idea
for a project. Projects need to be responsible for a product or they
just end up in the weeds. A federation of projects can simply maintain
a general mailing list and website.
Roy
Sanjiva,
>From the perspective of WS and the ws-* projects you mention, no change
at all, unless you want to link back and reference to the activities in
Santuario.
On the other hand, one thing the security project would want to do would
be to create a single point where people can come to to get
Berin, there security stuff happening in WS land as well: we're
implementing WS-Security, WS-Secure Conversation, WS-Trust and
WS-Security Policy .. in both Java and C (and thru the latter for PHP
etc.). Once those are done then we can do InfoCard and other stuff
that's coming down the pipe (like W
