Hi all,
Axl actually voted as well, but his emails didn't get through.
So here is a forwarded copy of Axl's vote, and I will add him onto the
initial PMC list that gets put forward.
Cheers,
Berin
Original Message
Subject:Fwd: VOTE: TLP Resolution
D
uccessor is appointed; and be it
> further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache PMC be and
> hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, th
Ceki,
Welcome :>.
Cheers,
Berin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Here are my (non-binding) votes.
>
> 1) +1
> 2) Santuario
> 3) +1
>
> Given that my current project will be heavily relying on XML-security
> and WS-Security and also as a former cryptography enthusiast, I would
> like to de
For my part...
1) +1
2) Santuario
3) +1
> Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook.
> >
> > I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make
> > it formal.
> >
> > All committers need to cast a vote on the following.
> >
> > 1
woohoo!! welcome ceki! we could sure use all the help we can get.
- dims
On 6/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here are my (non-binding) votes.
1) +1
2) Santuario
3) +1
Given that my current project will be heavily relying on XML-security
and WS-Security and also as a form
Here are my (non-binding) votes.
1) +1
2) Santuario
3) +1
Given that my current project will be
heavily relying on XML-security
and WS-Security and also as a former
cryptography enthusiast, I would
like to devote part of my time and energy
contributing to XML-security
and WS-security projects.
et of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache PMC be and
> hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the
> Apache XML PMC XML Security subproje
to the XML XML
Security sub-project and encumbered upon the Apache XML PMC
are hereafter discharged.
Original Message
Subject: Re: TLP Resolution
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 21:05:09 +1000
From: Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
To: security-dev@x
; An: security-dev@xml.apache.org
> Betreff: VOTE: TLP Resolution
>
> All,
>
> I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook.
>
> I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make it
> formal.
>
> All committers need to cast a vote on the foll
Here are my votes:
1) +1
2) Santuario
3) +1
Regards,
Werner
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2006 12:22
> An: security-dev@xml.apache.org
> Betreff: VOTE: TLP Resolution
>
> All,
>
il a successor is appointed; and be it
> further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache PMC be and
> hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Project; and be it further
>
> RE
cipation in the
> Apache Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache PMC be and
> hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the
> Apache XML PMC XML Security subproject; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to
ity pertaining to the XML XML
Security sub-project and encumbered upon the Apache XML PMC
are hereafter discharged.
Original Message
Subject: Re: TLP Resolution
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 21:05:09 +1000
From: Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: security-dev@xml.apache
ject; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the initial Apache PMC be and
hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the
Apache XML PMC XML Security subproject; and be it further
RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the XML XML
Security sub-project and encumbered upon the Ap
ild guessing..
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 5/3/06, Jesse Pelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Good catch. It's a registered trademark, no less, and in a related
>> >> >> field, so I dou
it
>> for
>> >> a project name. Too bad.
>> >>
>> >> -jesse-
>> >>
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 20
tch. It's a registered trademark, no less, and in a related
>> >> field, so I doubt SecureWave would be pleased to have Apache use it
>> for
>> >> a project name. Too bad.
>> >>
>> >> -jesse-
>> >>
>> >> -Original Message-
&
oubt SecureWave would be pleased to have Apache use it for
>> a project name. Too bad.
>>
>> -jesse-
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:26 AM
>> To: security-de
t;>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:26 AM
>> To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: TLP Resolution
>>
>> Sanctuary is a cool name. However there is a
; ,"Citadel," "Surety,"
>>>> "Security
>>>> Blanket" (or "Linus," with a nod to Charles Schulz' "Peanuts," but
>>>> you'd
>>>> want to get permission). With the possible exception of the last, none
>>>>
sure it has the right
connotations, though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Raul Benito
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 11:51 AM
To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: TLP Resolution
Sad, I like the name,
Perhaps a translation: Sa
ve would be pleased to have Apache use it for
a project name. Too bad.
-jesse-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:26 AM
To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: TLP Resolution
Sanctuary is a cool name. However there i
AM
To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: TLP Resolution
Sanctuary is a cool name. However there is a product named Sanctuary by
SecureWave: http://www.securewave.com/endpoint_security_solutions.jsp
--Sean
for obscure references, though.
But the name is really the last piece. You need a clearly articulated
purpose and scope before you can come up with a name that fits.
-Original Message-
From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 3:13 AM
To: security-dev@xml.apa
a nod to Charles Schulz'
> "Peanuts," but you'd
> > >>want to get permission). With the possible exception of
> the last, none
> > >>of these indulge the Apache penchant for obscure
> references, though.
> > >>
> > >&
penchant for obscure references, though.
>>
>>But the name is really the last piece. You need a clearly articulated
>>purpose and scope before you can come up with a name that fits.
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
eed a clearly articulated
>>purpose and scope before you can come up with a name that fits.
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 3:13 AM
>>To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: TLP
#x27;d
> > want to get permission). With the possible exception of the last, none
> > of these indulge the Apache penchant for obscure references, though.
> >
> > But the name is really the last piece. You need a clearly articulated
> > purpose and scope before you ca
;
> -Original Message-
> From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 3:13 AM
> To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: TLP Resolution
>
> Thoughts welcome :>.
>
> Berin Lautenbach wrote:
>
> > OK - I'm g
e up with a name that fits.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 3:13 AM
> To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: TLP Resolution
>
> Thoughts welcome :>.
>
> Berin Lautenbach wro
. You need a clearly articulated
purpose and scope before you can come up with a name that fits.
-Original Message-
From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 3:13 AM
To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: TLP Resolution
Thoughts welcome :>.
Be
I do not have problems with xml security as an Apache TLP.
+1. I do note Raul's concerns however.
Ax/
-Original Message-
From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 March 2006 05:50 AM
To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: TLP Resolution
Peoples,
Sometime ba
+0 from me.
I think is a good idea to have XKMS server or Federation
implemenatation, or more security.
But on the other hand I don't know if we can cope with the increase
of the scope with the lack of resources we have. For example the web
pages haven't been change with the new SVN... We don't
SORRY, complately wrong addressed, IGNORE Plz
Wouter
-Original Message-
From: Wouter Ketting
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:32
To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: RE: TLP Resolution
-Original Message-
From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
ch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:13
To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: TLP Resolution
Thoughts welcome :>.
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> OK - I'm going to take the idea to the board.
>
> Before I do - we need a couple of things.
>
> 1. A
Thoughts welcome :>.
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> OK - I'm going to take the idea to the board.
>
> Before I do - we need a couple of things.
>
> 1. A name. I'd personally be against anything fancy or non-obvious.
> But I don't really want to use "Apache Security" as I think it will get
> too co
OK - I'm going to take the idea to the board.
Before I do - we need a couple of things.
1. A name. I'd personally be against anything fancy or non-obvious.
But I don't really want to use "Apache Security" as I think it will get
too confusing against the security group within the ASF (the group
Ben Laurie wrote:
> It sounds like a very good idea to me, I'd certainly support it. Of
> course, we already have a CA. Written in, errr, perl :-)
. Was waiting for the perl comment :>. To put into context, my
original comment was after spending 5 hours fighting with OpenCA.
Cheers,
Be
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Dear Ben and Dear Ben,
>
> what do you guys think? A Security Federation/TLP/PMC. Starting with
> Apache XML-Security and Apache Juice.
It sounds like a very good idea to me, I'd certainly support it. Of
course, we already have a CA. Written in, errr, perl :-)
Cheers,
+1 and agree with comments below, though need to worry a little about
focus. I am just a lurker here, but would be interested in the proposed
project.
Phil
Werner Dittmann wrote:
+1 from me.
Just a comment regarding the charter: is it really only Apache XML
Security? IMHO this would be a
Dear Ben and Dear Ben,
what do you guys think? A Security Federation/TLP/PMC. Starting with
Apache XML-Security and Apache Juice.
thanks,
-- dims
On 3/11/06, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would be interested in widening it as well - with the proviso that it
> is like a federati
I would be interested in widening it as well - with the proviso that it
is like a federation. I.e. we use it to seed projects then build them
and spawn them into TLPs once they grow to size.
I might start sounding some people out.
Dims - what's your thoughts?
On the subject - having spent the m
+1 from me.
Just a comment regarding the charter: is it really only Apache XML
Security? IMHO this would be a bit too narrow, for example JuiCE is
not dependent on XML, maybe other security related software will be
pop up later as well.
I would like to see an "Apache Security" PMC that would addr
+1 from me
On 3/10/06, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peoples,
>
> Sometime back we talked about becoming a TLP. With the recent JuiCE
> efforts, + JSR 105 + XKMS we are starting to see a few different things
> occuring. I'd be hugely in favour of starting something at a higher
>
Peoples,
Sometime back we talked about becoming a TLP. With the recent JuiCE
efforts, + JSR 105 + XKMS we are starting to see a few different things
occuring. I'd be hugely in favour of starting something at a higher
level in Apache to get some visibility.
I'm also toying with the idea of creat
45 matches
Mail list logo
