Hi all,
Axl actually voted as well, but his emails didn't get through.
So here is a forwarded copy of Axl's vote, and I will add him onto the
initial PMC list that gets put forward.
Cheers,
Berin
Original Message
Subject: Fwd: VOTE: TLP Resolution
D
OK Calling it.
Following people voted:
Dims, Berin, Werner, Raul, Sean, Ceki, Steve
7 x +1 for TLP. (2 non-binding)
7 x +1 for BL as chair (2 non-binding)
6 x +1 for Santuario (2 non-binding) and 1 for Raksha.
So I will take to the XML PMC and then to then board with the TLP
project name of
Ceki,
Welcome :>.
Cheers,
Berin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Here are my (non-binding) votes.
>
> 1) +1
> 2) Santuario
> 3) +1
>
> Given that my current project will be heavily relying on XML-security
> and WS-Security and also as a former cryptography enthusiast, I would
> like to de
For my part...
1) +1
2) Santuario
3) +1
> Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook.
> >
> > I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make
> > it formal.
> >
> > All committers need to cast a vote on the following.
> >
> > 1
woohoo!! welcome ceki! we could sure use all the help we can get.
- dims
On 6/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here are my (non-binding) votes.
1) +1
2) Santuario
3) +1
Given that my current project will be heavily relying on XML-security
and WS-Security and also as a form
Here are my (non-binding) votes.
1) +1
2) Santuario
3) +1
Given that my current project will be
heavily relying on XML-security
and WS-Security and also as a former
cryptography enthusiast, I would
like to devote part of my time and energy
contributing to XML-security
and WS-security projects.
Still need votes from:
Erwin van der Koogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Axl Mattheus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vishal Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Milan Tomic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Karel Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Noah Levitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Walter Hoehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll give it another 48 hours then
1) +1
2) Santuario
3) +1
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
All,
I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook.
I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make it
formal.
All committers need to cast a vote on the following.
1) Support for going to TLP as a broad Security project
; An: security-dev@xml.apache.org
> Betreff: VOTE: TLP Resolution
>
> All,
>
> I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook.
>
> I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make it
> formal.
>
> All committers need to cast a vote on the foll
Here are my votes:
1) +1
2) Santuario
3) +1
Regards,
Werner
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2006 12:22
> An: security-dev@xml.apache.org
> Betreff: VOTE: TLP Resolution
>
> All,
>
Oops - meant to be formal.
1) +1
2) Santuario (I still like it a lot :>)
3) +1 :>
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook.
>
> I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make it
> formal.
>
> All committers need to cast a vote o
Oops!
+1 to Raksha.
+1 to Berin as PMC Chair.
-- dims
On 5/31/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me.
On 5/31/06, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook.
>
> I've floated the idea on board@ and got no object
+1 from me.
On 5/31/06, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook.
I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make it
formal.
All committers need to cast a vote on the following.
1) Support for going to TLP as a bro
All,
I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook.
I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make it
formal.
All committers need to cast a vote on the following.
1) Support for going to TLP as a broad Security project (+1 or -1)
2) The name of the project. See list of
14 matches
Mail list logo
