Re: xmlsec 1.3 released... and now what's left.

2005-11-28 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Sean, +1 from me. -- dims On 11/28/05, Sean Mullan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raul Benito wrote: > > Hello Everybody, > > After the painful release of the xmlsec(mainly because of the > > updating of the web page, and deadlines in my "day" job), I begin to > > wonder where the java xml sec s

Re: xmlsec 1.3 released... and now what's left.

2005-11-28 Thread Sean Mullan
Raul Benito wrote: Hello Everybody, After the painful release of the xmlsec(mainly because of the updating of the web page, and deadlines in my "day" job), I begin to wonder where the java xml sec should lead. From my area of expertise, performance: The fast path (URI selection, only envelop

Re: xmlsec 1.3 released... and now what's left.

2005-11-28 Thread Raul Benito
On 11/27/05, Werner Dittmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raul, > > thanks for the info. If I understood you correctly then the > performance problem is due to some specific Xpath/namespace > usage for xml-sec, not a generic XPath problem to locate > some elements in a document. > You are right, an

Re: xmlsec 1.3 released... and now what's left.

2005-11-27 Thread Werner Dittmann
Raul, thanks for the info. If I understood you correctly then the performance problem is due to some specific Xpath/namespace usage for xml-sec, not a generic XPath problem to locate some elements in a document. Background to this question: some specifications (WS-SecurityPolicy) use XPath to loc

Re: xmlsec 1.3 released... and now what's left.

2005-11-27 Thread Raul Benito
On 11/26/05, Venu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Raul, > > Raul Benito wrote: > > Hello Everybody, > > After the painful release of the xmlsec(mainly because of the > > updating of the web page, and deadlines in my "day" job), I begin to > > wonder where the java xml sec should lead. > > > >

Re: xmlsec 1.3 released... and now what's left.

2005-11-26 Thread Raul Benito
On 11/25/05, Werner Dittmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raul, > > first of all thanks for the big imporvments you did for xmlsec !! > > With respect to performance: I'm just working on JuiCE to have > a JCE compliant provider for the main functions of OpenSSL. First > tests I did (using some mode

Re: xmlsec 1.3 released... and now what's left.

2005-11-25 Thread Venu
Hello Raul, Raul Benito wrote: Hello Everybody, After the painful release of the xmlsec(mainly because of the updating of the web page, and deadlines in my "day" job), I begin to wonder where the java xml sec should lead. From my area of expertise, performance: The fast path (URI selection,

Re: xmlsec 1.3 released... and now what's left.

2005-11-25 Thread Werner Dittmann
Raul, first of all thanks for the big imporvments you did for xmlsec !! With respect to performance: I'm just working on JuiCE to have a JCE compliant provider for the main functions of OpenSSL. First tests I did (using some modes inside BouncyCastle) were promising. We're waiting for some Sun ac

xmlsec 1.3 released... and now what's left.

2005-11-25 Thread Raul Benito
Hello Everybody, After the painful release of the xmlsec(mainly because of the updating of the web page, and deadlines in my "day" job), I begin to wonder where the java xml sec should lead. >From my area of expertise, performance: The fast path (URI selection, only enveloping transformation)