[GUMP@brutus]: Project xml-security (in module xml-security) failed

2005-02-13 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

[GUMP@brutus]: Project xml-security (in module xml-security) failed

2005-02-13 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

can't verify the signature if xml doc is created from xml-bean

2005-02-13 Thread David Han
Hi I have a xml doc created by apache-xml bean. This xml doc can be signed, encrypted (RSA), decrypted but signature can't be verified! If I create exactly the same xml doc using Document instead of apache xml bean, everything is OK! Any idea? It seems to me I have to take away all xml-bean code

diffrent build.xml

2005-02-13 Thread Raul Benito
Hi all, I need some historic background in the xml-sec library. I need to know why there are three different(but similar) build*.xml files, and if we can get rid off of two of them (build-deprecated.xml and build-ant1.5.xml) and concentrate only in build.xml Any insight will be appreciate. Regards,

Re: diffrent build.xml

2005-02-13 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me to remove the old ones. -- dims On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:25:08 +0100, Raul Benito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, I need some historic background in the xml-sec library. > I need to know why there are three different(but similar) build*.xml > files, and if we can get rid off of two

RE: diffrent build.xml

2005-02-13 Thread Axl Mattheus
Raul The original build.xml was quite a monster. I then created build-ant1.5.xml to leverage ant 1.5+ functionality. I am not sure where build-deprecated.xml comes from; I remember a mail doing the rounds about a year ago around the renaming of the build file. For all I know, you can safely remov

RE: diffrent build.xml

2005-02-13 Thread Axl Mattheus
Raul The original build.xml was quite a monster. I then created build-ant1.5.xml to leverage ant 1.5+ functionality. I am not sure where build-deprecated.xml comes from; I remember a mail doing the rounds about a year ago around the renaming of the build file. For all I know, you can safely remov