Re: Cannot sign-verify twice in the same thread with different XMLSignature instances

You Wss4j guy always using untested XMLSignature constructors!!! ;) Just joking. You hit again another XMLSignature constructor that there is no unit test for it. The problem is that for creating new Signatures(for signing) public XMLSignature( Document doc, String BaseURI, Element Signat

Re: Cannot sign-verify twice in the same thread with different XMLSignature instances

Raul, Sean, Looks like the prev patch from me for parseFragment does not really help much :( As XMLCipher has a private constructor and the parseFragment is in a private class Serializer inside that class. So we are back to square one... How about we cut a branch so that we don't disturb the rel

Re: Cannot sign-verify twice in the same thread with different XMLSignature instances

Hi Raul, On 11/5/06, Raul Benito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You Wss4j guy always using untested XMLSignature constructors!!! ;) Just joking. You hit again another XMLSignature constructor that there is no unit test for it. The problem is that for creating new Signatures(for signing) public XMLS

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40896] New: - Cannot sign-verify twice in the same thread with different XMLSignature instances

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40896] - Cannot sign-verify twice in the same thread with different XMLSignature instances

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Cannot sign-verify twice in the same thread with different XMLSignature instances

> Can you raise a bug report in bugzilla, for proper tracking? will do. Done : http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40896 Thanks, Ruchith -- www.ruchith.org

Re: PATCH: String Comparison in ElementProxy

Hi Raul, Could you think of a way we can fix the problem without having a significant performance hit. This clearly is a blocking issue for me. If eventually we decide to change the comparisons to use String.equals() I could give you the list of all relevant occurrences in the code. Thanks,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40897] New: - String comparisons using '==' causes validation errors with some parsers

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40896] - Cannot sign-verify twice in the same thread with different XMLSignature instances

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Cannot sign-verify twice in the same thread with different XMLSignature instances

On 11/5/06, Ruchith Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Raul, On 11/5/06, Raul Benito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You Wss4j guy always using untested XMLSignature constructors!!! ;) > Just joking. You hit again another XMLSignature constructor that there > is no unit test for it. > The probl

Re: PATCH: String Comparison in ElementProxy

Hi VIshal, This is going to be one of the features for 1.4.1 with the DocumentBuilder polling. I want to take out all the comparisons with namespaces and let the API user to decide how lax he wants to be with the strictness of the elements. He can disable namespace checking altogether or do it wit

Re: Cannot sign-verify twice in the same thread with different XMLSignature instances

Hi Raul, thanks a lot for the quick fix ! Thanks, Ruchith On 11/5/06, Raul Benito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/5/06, Ruchith Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Raul, > > On 11/5/06, Raul Benito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You Wss4j guy always using untested XMLSignature constructo