[security-discuss] b42A TX on x86

2006-07-20 Thread Mike Lewis
Robert Bailey wrote: > I'd be curious to see if you are able to configure ssh access into the > TX host from a non-TX system. If this is part of your testing would > you mind posting your success/fail? I haven't been able to ssh between identically configured TX hosts with the cipso protocol.

[Security-discuss] Documenting the availability of privileges within Solaris

2006-07-20 Thread Darren Reed
James Carlson wrote: >Darren Reed writes: > >>>Honestly, if I were a third party driver writer, I would likely not >>>use least privilege. The main problem is that the interfaces are not >>>present on S9 and older systems, and thus represent a complication >>>with little benefit to me or my custo

[security-discuss] SRSS in TX b42a/b43

2006-07-20 Thread Yates, Spencer A.
HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/security-discuss/attachments/20060720/5b404940/attachment.html>

[security-discuss] SRSS in TX b42a/b43

2006-07-20 Thread Lokanath Das
Yates, Spencer A. wrote: > According to the instructions, after installing SRSS a few lines need to > be added to the /etc/pam.conf file. > > The utnsclogin entries to be added are as follows: > utnsclogin auth required /opt/SUNWut/lib/pam_sunray_amgh.so.1 > utnsclogin auth required pam_

[security-discuss] TX b43

2006-07-20 Thread Yates, Spencer A.
-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/security-discuss/attachments/20060720/0283f029/attachment.html>

[security-discuss] SRSS in TX b42a/b43

2006-07-20 Thread Glenn Faden
If it already exists, then just leave it there. You will need it and pam_authtok_get.so.1. Here is the portion utnsclogin auth section of pam.conf for a SunRay server. --Glenn # added to utnsclogin by SunRay Server Software -- utnsclogin utnsclogin auth requisite /opt/SUNWut/lib/sunray_get_user

[security-discuss] Re: OpenSolaris + LDAP + PAM

2006-07-20 Thread Henry B. Hotz
Depends on where you want enforcement to happen. I was thinking of prohibiting simple binds to LDAP that aren't over SSL. On Jul 20, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Gary Winiger wrote: >> There is example code published that show how to check passwords in a >> pre-auth plugin. > > Or you can front en

[security-discuss] Re: OpenSolaris + LDAP + PAM

2006-07-20 Thread Gary Winiger
> There is example code published that show how to check passwords in a > pre-auth plugin. Or you can front end it in the PAM stack with pam_authtok_check(5). Gary..

[security-discuss] b42A TX on x86

2006-07-20 Thread Lewis, Michael D (N-Jackpine Technologies)
Thanks Robert and thanks Glenn, that solved the problem. I didn't even know that was an option I had to consider. -- Mike > -Original Message- > From: Glenn Faden [mailto:glenn.faden at sun.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 9:42 AM > To: Robert Bailey > Cc: Lewis, Michael D (N-Jackp

[security-discuss] Re: OpenSolaris + LDAP + PAM

2006-07-20 Thread Henry B. Hotz
There is example code published that show how to check passwords in a pre-auth plugin. Based on personal experience I recommend that you not use it, but instead implement the *new* functionality and "return 0" to let the server check the password itself. This fixed a bug in my plugin (whi

[security-discuss] TX b43

2006-07-20 Thread Glenn Faden
The Trusted Extensions packages in build 42a were compressed and contained an incorrect i.manifest file. Getting around this problem requires the workaround described in http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/security/projects/tx/InstallIssues. The packages in build 43 are not compressed and u

[security-discuss] b42A TX on x86

2006-07-20 Thread Lewis, Michael D (N-Jackpine Technologies)
Well, I should give a little background first. We have a Sparc platform that we are migrating to an Intel platform. I have installed b42A on the Sparc with TX and saw that it all works without any problem. I get the multi-level CDE complete with labels in the Sparc version. On the Intel version,

[security-discuss] b42A TX on x86

2006-07-20 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Glenn Faden wrote: > I think that you should try Robert Bailey's suggestion. Although the > Xorg server (the default on x86 systems) is supposed to support Trusted > Extensions, there were some packaging problems in producing build 42a. > So you should try using the Xsun server instead. This iss

[security-discuss] b42A TX on x86

2006-07-20 Thread Glenn Faden
I think that you should try Robert Bailey's suggestion. Although the Xorg server (the default on x86 systems) is supposed to support Trusted Extensions, there were some packaging problems in producing build 42a. So you should try using the Xsun server instead. This issue will be fixed in the ne

[Security-discuss] Documenting the availability of privileges within Solaris

2006-07-20 Thread James Carlson
Darren Reed writes: > >The underlying point is that LP provides a robust mechanism for > >implementing those sorts of features. It does _not_ mean that > >everything in the system has actually been reduced to the least > >privilege necessary. > > > >That's a lengthy process, and if you want to con

[security-discuss] b42A TX on x86

2006-07-20 Thread Robert Bailey
ecurity-discuss at opensolaris.org -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/security-discuss/attachments/20060720/9242452e/attachment.html>

[security-discuss] b42A TX on x86

2006-07-20 Thread Robert Bailey
Make sure you have Sun's X11 configured for use, not the opensource version. # kdmconfig # select sun That should to it. On Jul 20, 2006, at 1:11 AM, Glenn Faden wrote: > Are you getting the graphical login screen? The default session > under Options should be Trusted CDE. Are you able to s