Krishna Yenduri wrote:
>
> I have made an update to the original design. There is no need to change
> the SPI version with this update.
Great.
> Thanks,
> -Krishna
>
>> 2.1 SPI changes:
>> -
>>
>> 2.1.1. cm_capability_mask field
>>
>> A new field is added to the crypto_mech_info
I have made an update to the original design. There is no need to change
the SPI version with this update.
Thanks,
-Krishna
>2.1 SPI changes:
>-
>
>2.1.1. cm_capability_mask field
>
>A new field is added to the crypto_mech_info_t structure.
>
>+ uint32_tcm_capabili
Please review the attached design document for the RFE -
6494834 support check for threshold when using hardware providers even
for multi-part requests
This RFE allows the sharing of an operation context between
a Solaris crypto framework hardware provider and a software provi
