Actually, since this discussion turned to general query language
functionality, I want to voice another question I had some time ago - why
not to go standards way with complex cases? In two words, let's leave #ask
language for simple cases and current uses and employ SPARQL or other
standard langua
Great! Please keep us updated!
BTW, can you describe a use case that you have at CC for RDFa? I think such
scenarios can benefit the community.
Thank you,
Sergey
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Sergey Chernyshev wrote:
>
Yeh, Yaron had the same question when we discussed it and it's absolutely
true, that linking to RDF version of the page is clearly more functional,
but there is an issue of those two documents (HTML page and RDF document)
being different sources of info opening potential door for spammers and it
lo
On Sonntag, 8. Juni 2008, Rolf Lampa wrote:
> Markus Krötzsch skrev:
> > could ever be name clashes on "."? (Is there anyone who ever used a
> > "." within a property name?) I can do both ... whatever most users
> > prefer.
>
> Yes, in Mediawiki I planned to use dots for just that. Sometimes there'
On Montag, 9. Juni 2008, Reini Urban wrote:
> 2008/6/8 Rolf Lampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Articifical Intelligence had the simple concept of unification which
> is basically
> the concept of #ask.
> You match a pattern against a list of facts/rules, and recursively bind
> variables to the resul
On Sonntag, 8. Juni 2008, Mov GP 0 wrote:
> Hi,
> from my subjective view the '.' is more easily to use and finer to
> read. But I support the technical standpoint that '->' will less
> likely result in the need for escape-techniques.
>
> Anyway, the escaping might get archived using '[[ ]]'. Examp
On Montag, 9. Juni 2008, S Page wrote:
> Jeff Thompson wrote:
> > At the beginning of SMW development, the idea was that, to make everyone
> > happy, anyone could create any property that they want and give it
> > whatever meaning they want in their wiki. That's great for making
> > everyone feel
On Sonntag, 8. Juni 2008, Jeff Thompson wrote:
> At the beginning of SMW development, the idea was that, to make everyone
> happy, anyone could create any property that they want and give it whatever
> meaning they want in their wiki. That's great for making everyone feel
> included (even the wiki
