That's good news. And it's great news about blank values not getting counted
as errors! That should help out a lot of people who store data in templates.
-Yaron
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Markus Krötzsch <
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
> By the way: however we call it, this propert
By the way: however we call it, this property already has another nice side
effect. Since SMW now keeps track of all pages where a property was used with
an unsuitable value, SMW can automatically revisit these pages when the type
of a property has changed. Example:
* For storing street address
2009/8/2 Yaron Koren :
> Keeping with my preference for having property names be prepositional
> phrases, how about "Has improper value for"?
"Has improper value for" ++
Dan.
> I should note that I hope that properties with blank values don't get
> included in this accounting. Speaking of which
On Montag, 3. August 2009, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On 2009-08-03 14:57, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> > Strictly speaking, a type is something that only a property has, so it
> > could be confusing to use it for values (I assume what you mean is "some
> > value given to the property 'has'
On Sonntag, 2. August 2009, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
...
> > I should note that I hope that properties with blank values don't get
> > included in this accounting. Speaking of which, let me note that I also
> > think it would be great if blank values stopped being viewed as errors in
> > general.
>
Hi Markus,
On 2009-08-03 14:57, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> Strictly speaking, a type is something that only a property has, so it could
> be confusing to use it for values (I assume what you mean is "some value
> given
> to the property 'has' the wrong type").
Ok, scratch that :) I shouldn't wri
