On 26/08/11 15:31, Chris Davis wrote:
> Am I correct in observing that SMW 1.6 does not support sparql queries
> directly included in wiki pages, but only allows for ask queries which
> are then translated into sparql syntax?
>
> The reason for the question is that I'm one of the developers of the
Am I correct in observing that SMW 1.6 does not support sparql queries directly
included in wiki pages, but only allows for ask queries which are then
translated into sparql syntax?
The reason for the question is that I'm one of the developers of the
SparqlExtension, and would like to migrate t
