Hello Markus,
First of all, your alternative proposal looks much better than the
original one because of more flexibility. And praise you for the great
solution of optional naming - I hope it will be possible to implement
it!

What about RDF export and Import vocabulary features? I have really
two questions concerning both those features:

== RDFExport+RDF store question==

 As far I as I can see subobjects should be turned to the blank nodes,
shouldn't they?

== Import vocabulary question ==

Is it possible to map the subobject to RDF  class? That can be
extremely useful even in simple vocabularies like FOAF.
Here is an example: we have the wiki-page of Yury who has an online
account in two social networks: Facebook and Vkontakte.

===Example===
It's pretty easy to describe this fact with subobjects:
##### PAGE STARTS#########
Yury has [[has account::{{#subobject:
                                      service=http://facebook.com
                                      accountname=ganqqwerty}}
|facebook account]],
               [[has account:: {{#subobject:
                                       service=vkontakte.ru
                                        accountname=katkov}}
|Vkontakte.ru account]]
#####PAGE ENDS#########
===RDF Export===
If I map has account to foaf:account, map service to uring rdf export
we will get the following (simplified)
:Yury_id_in_wiki                 foaf:account
  :Yury_id_in_wiki#tmpnum1 .
:Yury_id_in_wiki#tmpnum1  foaf:accountServiceHomepage <http://facebook.com>
:Yury_id_in_wiki#tmpnum1 foaf:accountName                    "ganqqwerty"
=== Problem ===
The problem is that the property foaf:account has range
foaf:OnlineAccount. Our RDF export now is a little bit incomplete.

===Proposal===

Make it possible to assign some kind of type to the subobject and map
those types to RDFS or OWL classes. I honestly don't know how this can
be done - probably with the special attribute "type" or "category".

The typing can be needed now only in case of RDF export. If I have a
wiki with thousands of subobjects it would always be nice to see what
kind of subobjects are there.


Anyway the subobject feature will help me to tie together a bundle of
properties in Semantic Social Profile, for example Name of the country
of living, Name of the city of living, Street, house number as well as
Geographic coordinates of the place where the user lives.

Sorry if was late fo the discussion,
Yury

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Markus Krötzsch
<mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
>
> Following up the discussions we had at SMWCon in Berlin, we have now
> implemented a new feature for "internal objects" in SMW. This email
> explains this feature and starts the discussion on some open questions
> for it to become stable.
>
>
> == Goal ==
>
> Allow SMW annotations to refer to objects that have their own
> property-value pairs just like wiki pages, but that do not actually have
> an article in the wiki. This can be used to "group" property-value pairs
> given on one page without requiring new auxiliary pages to be created.
> It also integrates the main functionality of the Semantic Internal
> Objects (SIO) extension into SMW.
>
>
> == Feature Overview: Current Prototype Implementation ==
>
> SMW now has a new "subobject" feature. For example, you can use the
> parserfunction #subobject on some page "Example page" as follows:
>
> {{#subobject:street address
> | street name=Parks Road
> | postcode=OX1 3QD
> | city=Oxford
> | country=UK
> }}
>
> This does the following:
>
> (A) create a new subobject called "Example page#_anInternalId",
> (B) assign the property values for "street name", ..., "country" to this
> subobject,
> (C) assign the subobject "Example page#_anInternalId" as a property
> value for "street address" to "Example page".
>
> You could have achieved a similar effect as follows:
>
> (A') create a new page called "my auxiliary page",
> (B') edit this new page to contain the text:
>
>  [[street name::Parks Road]]
>  [[postcode::OX1 3QD]]
>  [[city::Oxford]]
>  [[country::UK]]
>
> (C') edit the page "Example page" to contain the text:
>
>  [[street address::my auxiliary page]]
>
>
> The difference when using #subobject is that you do not create a new
> auxiliary page. Instead, a subobject of "Example page" is created by
> SMW. Also, the function #subobject does not display anything unless an
> error occurred that needs to be reported.
>
> Subobjects are named automatically by following the schema "Parent page
> name#_someInternalId". When subobjects are displayed to users, they thus
> appear like links to sections within their parent page. This can happen,
> e.g., subobjects might occur in query results (example above: {{#ask:
> [[postcode::OX1 3QD]] }}). Likewise, subobjects are also addressed by
> this name "Parent page name#_someInternalId" in all search and export
> interfaces in SMW. For example, one can view the data for one particular
> subobject in Special:Browse.
>
> In general, subobjects should work like normal pages in most SMW
> interfaces. The goal of this naming is to avoid any clashes with real
> pages and with real sections in real pages while still allowing the same
> methods to be used.
>
> The feature can be tested in the current SVN version but it is still
> unstable and might change significantly (read on).
>
>
> == Relation to Semantic Internal Objects ==
>
> The feature is very similar to the SIO extension. The difference is that
> in SIO, the main property ("street address" above) points from the
> subobject to the parent page. In the above example, "street address"
> really means "has street address" while in SIO it would be used like "is
> street address of".
>
> The other difference is that subobjects work with both SQL and RDF
> stores, are exported in RDF and are compatible with interfaces like
> Special:Browse.
>
>
> == Alternative Proposal ==
>
> Instead of having a parser function that creates a subobject and assigns
> it to a property as a value, one could also have a parser function that
> only does the first thing and that *returns* a subobject for later use.
> This would require some further changes but it might be more elegant.
>
> For example, a call like
>
> {{#subobject: street name=Parks Road | postcode=OX1 3QD| city=Oxford }}
>
> would just "create" such an object and return its name (e.g.
> "Example_page#_someId"). Then one could use this name as a value to
> other properties, e.g.:
>
> [[street address::{{#subobject: street name=Parks Road
>     | postcode=OX1 3QD
>     | city=Oxford
> }}]]
>
> One advantage of this is that one could arbitrarily nest subobjects,
> i.e. use subobjects as property values when declaring other subobjects
> (SMW can already do this, just the input syntax does not support it).
> Another advantage is that subobjects could (optionally) be named instead
> of using the name generated by SMW now. For example, one could have
>
> {{#subobject:department_address
>   |street name=Parks Road | postcode=OX1 3QD| city=Oxford }}
>
> to create a subobject called "Example page#department_address" which
> could be used in other annotations on *any* page (this is already
> possible with subobjects now, but since their names are generated by SMW
> they might not be stable over time). In this case, it might be less
> desirable to return the name of the subobject.
>
> Overall, this alternative approach would allow subobjects to be used as
> first-class citizens of the SMW data space instead of viewing them as
> auxiliary objects for encoding compound property values.
>
>
> == Request for Comments ==
>
> Feedback is welcome. The first question is which approach to subobjects
> should eventually be used. The follow-up question is how the respective
> parser function should be called. But there might also be completely
> different comments and questions.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Markus
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Semediawiki-devel mailing list
> Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel



--
Yury V. Katkov
WikiVote! llc

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Reply via email to