Hi,
as great as SMW is by itself, I'd like to hear your thoughts or experiences
regarding integration in or collaboration with other tools.
In some cases, SMW can be a real competitor to other "bigger" solutions, in
other it might not have a chance to compete. Many other tools offer wikis as
w
MW is a CMS and SMW is a SCMS. Simple :)
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Yaron Koren wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> MediaWiki is a CMS, and so is MW + SMW - first and foremost, it's a way to
> manage content.
>
> Also, please keep the discussion civil - even if you think someone's being
> uncivil to y
Hi John,
MediaWiki is a CMS, and so is MW + SMW - first and foremost, it's a way to
manage content.
Also, please keep the discussion civil - even if you think someone's being
uncivil to you, the best approach is to de-escalate and focus on the issues.
-Yaron
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jo
Markus, your stunning words below may be confusing to more than me. MW
is a CMS, SMW is /not/. Discussing 'surface syntax' of MW's wikitext, is
so irrelevant to SMW's semantic annotations of that wikitext, that I
don't know where to even begin...
If you'd rather not discuss the options I raised
Hi Markus,
I also make the same careful distinction as you about MW categories vs
RDF classes. I don't use categories for concrete RDF classes, as I
prefix concrete classes with "Type:" now storing them in the Main:
namespace (example: Type:Community). I use the word 'concrete' here to
indica
Dear all,
I made a Google Code-In task proposal about
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56547 and added it to
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Google_Code-in#Code !
Now we need a mentor for this. As I am not a developer, I cannot be a (good)
mentor for this. Is anybody interested? Thi
