Thanks Markus that's really good news.
I'll keep those restrictions in mind. Really large n-ary properties would anyway
be very much the exception.
Thanks again for your great SMW effort.
Cheers,
Gu
Quoting Markus Krötzsch :
> On Donnerstag, 4. März 2010, zehet...@molgen.mpg.de wrote:
> > Hi,
On Donnerstag, 4. März 2010, zehet...@molgen.mpg.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> well the number of possible fields in n-ary properties is a make or break
> criteria for me to be able to use MW/SMW, so it's a point I don't dare to
> lose out of sight.
>
> Right now the largest properties I added to the wiki
Hi,
well the number of possible fields in n-ary properties is a make or break
criteria for me to be able to use MW/SMW, so it's a point I don't dare to lose
out of sight.
Right now the largest properties I added to the wiki have 15 to 20 fields (but
there are potential data with 60+).
'Unlimited'
On Donnerstag, 4. März 2010, zehet...@molgen.mpg.de wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Semantic_MediaWiki_1.5.0
>
> doesn't mention any restriction in the number of 'fields' of an n-ary
> property as it was mentioned in earlier announcements.
>
> Has this new limitation
Hi Markus,
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Semantic_MediaWiki_1.5.0
doesn't mention any restriction in the number of 'fields' of an n-ary property
as it was mentioned in earlier announcements.
Has this new limitation been implemented in 1.5 and if so, what is the limit and
any advice how to c
Hi all,
we plan to release SMW 1.5.0 within the next few days. Two or three issues
still are on my list for being fixed, but most of the code should be ready
now. Moreover, there has just been a new release of Semantic Maps, and there
will soon be a release of Semantic Forms.
Testers are welc
