Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-10-13 Thread Markus Krötzsch
On 13/10/2010 08:59, Samuel Lampa wrote: > On 09/22/2010 11:29 AM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: > > Many thanks for that! > > Well, I think it is now time for a little update. > > I currently have a 2-month employment (with possible extension) as a > Bioinformatician / Software developer at a Next Gen

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-10-13 Thread Samuel Lampa
On 09/22/2010 11:29 AM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: > On 21/09/2010 18:34, Samuel Lampa wrote: >> On 09/21/2010 04:02 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: >>> On 20/09/2010 16:17, Samuel Lampa wrote: Also there is more interesting stuff that would be nice to add to the current SMWWriter/POM functionalit

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-22 Thread Markus Krötzsch
On 21/09/2010 18:34, Samuel Lampa wrote: > On 09/21/2010 04:02 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: >> On 20/09/2010 16:17, Samuel Lampa wrote: >>> Also there is more interesting stuff that would be nice to add to the >>> current SMWWriter/POM functionality, such as ability to update facts >>> annotated via

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-21 Thread Samuel Lampa
On 09/21/2010 04:02 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: > On 20/09/2010 16:17, Samuel Lampa wrote: >> Also there is more interesting stuff that would be nice to add to the >> current SMWWriter/POM functionality, such as ability to update facts >> annotated via template calls (so that one can present importe

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-21 Thread Markus Krötzsch
On 20/09/2010 16:17, Samuel Lampa wrote: > On 09/19/2010 03:01 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: > >> (the SMW-SPARQL-Update >> functionality via SMWWriter would remain an extension, but could >> possibly be integrated with SMWWriter). > > Sound like a good idea. Possibly one could also merge/bundle code

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-21 Thread Markus Krötzsch
gt; > *From:* Karima Rafes > *To:* Markus Krötzsch > *Cc:* semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > *Sent:* Mon, September 20, 2010 2:19:55 AM > *Subject:* Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion > > Hi > > I'm very tired so I will be short. > > Only 2 truths : >

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-20 Thread Samuel Lampa
On 09/19/2010 03:01 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: > (the SMW-SPARQL-Update > functionality via SMWWriter would remain an extension, but could > possibly be integrated with SMWWriter). Sound like a good idea. Possibly one could also merge/bundle code from PageObjectModel, as well. The current depend

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-20 Thread Michael Erdmann
On 19.09.2010 14:38, Markus Krötzsch wrote: > In principle, yes, but not now or in the next two weeks. I still find > discussions to be easy to have via email. We can record the *outcome* of > the discussions on the wiki, but I don't see what the advantage would be > in having a second copy of al

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-20 Thread Alfredas Chm
s To: Markus Krötzsch Cc: semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Mon, September 20, 2010 2:19:55 AM Subject: Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion Hi I'm very tired so I will be short. Only 2 truths : 1) SMW has always raeson. The triplets in RDF of one page IS the result of the query sele

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-19 Thread Karima Rafes
Hi I'm very tired so I will be short. Only 2 truths : 1) SMW has always raeson. The triplets in RDF of one page IS the result of the query select * where { ?p ?v} in the triplestore. 2) the customer has always raeson. So : 1) Any extensions rdfIO or halo, etc haven't to change the graph of SMW.

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-19 Thread Markus Krötzsch
On 18/09/2010 18:35, Samuel Lampa wrote: > On 09/18/2010 03:22 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: >> On 18/09/2010 15:05, Alfredas Chm wrote: >>> As the first thing on the agenda, I would like to ask Markus to create a >>> page (and add permissions) on the semantic-mediawiki.org >>>

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-19 Thread Markus Krötzsch
On 19/09/2010 12:12, Jeroen De Dauw wrote: > Hey, > > On 19 September 2010 12:00, Alfredas Chm > wrote: > Just one comment. Could we perhaps copy the discussion emails to the > discussion page of the > http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/SPARQL_and_RDF

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-19 Thread Jeroen De Dauw
Hey, On 19 September 2010 12:00, Alfredas Chm wrote: Just one comment. Could we perhaps copy the discussion emails to the discussion page of the http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/SPARQL_and_RDF_stores_for_SMW - so its easier to aggregate all the ideas It makes more sense to place them the

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-19 Thread Alfredas Chm
@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Sat, September 18, 2010 6:35:59 PM Subject: Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion On 09/18/2010 03:22 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: > On 18/09/2010 15:05, Alfredas Chm wrote: >> As the first thing on the agenda, I would like to ask Markus to create a >> page (and add perm

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-18 Thread Samuel Lampa
On 09/18/2010 03:22 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: > On 18/09/2010 15:05, Alfredas Chm wrote: >> As the first thing on the agenda, I would like to ask Markus to create a >> page (and add permissions) on the semantic-mediawiki.org >> to put the info on the separate >> ex

Re: [SMW-devel] [RDF] Discussion

2010-09-18 Thread Markus Krötzsch
On 18/09/2010 15:05, Alfredas Chm wrote: > > Dear Devel, > > this is to initiate the discussion on the integration of the numerous > RDF import/export related extensions (Halo, SparqlExtension, RDFIO, > LinkedWiki). > > After the initial discussion with the project leaders (ex Samuel), > Markus & Y