Re: [SMW-devel] Namespace Clutter

2011-04-16 Thread Markus Krötzsch
: [SMW-devel] Namespace Clutter OK, 2 namespaces: fundamentals and derived things. TYPE's are not defined in terms of anything else. Property's, Form's, Filter's and Concept's all have definitions written on them.. On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Jeroen De Dauw

Re: [SMW-devel] Namespace Clutter

2011-04-15 Thread Jeroen De Dauw
Hey, You cannot put all the stuff in one namespace; how would you then know what it actually is? For example properties show a list of pages on which they are used (plus the value they have there). This information would need to be represented in another way if it all was in a single namespace.

Re: [SMW-devel] Namespace Clutter

2011-04-15 Thread Robert Murphy
OK, 2 namespaces: fundamentals and derived things. TYPE's are not defined in terms of anything else. Property's, Form's, Filter's and Concept's all have definitions written on them.. On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.comwrote: Hey, You cannot put all the

Re: [SMW-devel] Namespace Clutter

2011-04-15 Thread Smith, Tim
...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 07:10 PM To: Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.com Cc: Semantic MediaWiki Developers List semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SMW-devel] Namespace Clutter OK, 2 namespaces: fundamentals and derived things. TYPE's are not defined in terms

Re: [SMW-devel] Namespace Clutter

2011-04-15 Thread John McClure
. -Original Message- From: Robert Murphy [mailto:mrandmrsmur...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 5:37 PM To: Smith, Tim Cc: semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SMW-devel] Namespace Clutter OK, so then why are namespaces proliferating? On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:48 PM