-
> Sent using BlackBerry
>
>
> *From*: Robert Murphy [mailto:mrandmrsmur...@gmail.com
> <mailto:mrandmrsmur...@gmail.com>]
> *Sent*: Friday, April 15, 2011 07:10 PM
> *To*: Jeroen De Dauw <mailto:jeroended...@gmail.com>>
> *Cc
ion each wiki designer needs to make, no doubt.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Murphy [mailto:mrandmrsmur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 5:37 PM
To: Smith, Tim
Cc: semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SMW-devel] Namespace Clutter
OK, so then why are namespaces pr
iawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *Subject*: Re: [SMW-devel] Namespace Clutter
>
> OK, 2 namespaces: fundamentals and derived things. TYPE's are not defined
> in terms of anything else. Property's, Form's, Filter's and Concept's all
> have definitions wr
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 07:10 PM
To: Jeroen De Dauw
Cc: Semantic MediaWiki Developers List
Subject: Re: [SMW-devel] Namespace Clutter
OK, 2 namespaces: fundamentals and derived things. TYPE's are not defined in
terms of anything else. Property's, Form's, Filter'
OK, 2 namespaces: fundamentals and derived things. TYPE's are not defined
in terms of anything else. Property's, Form's, Filter's and Concept's all
have definitions written on them..
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
> You cannot put all the stuff in one namespace;
Hey,
You cannot put all the stuff in one namespace; how would you then know what
it actually is? For example properties show a list of pages on which they
are used (plus the value they have there). This information would need to be
represented in another way if it all was in a single namespace. Th
Dear All,
I have a strange idea, and I'm looking for you to tell me why it is nuts!
It seems to me that the proliferation of namespaces is a bad thing. It
makes looking for stuff harder and clutters up a wiki. That being said, SMW
and it's associates add A LOT of mess in this regard:
1. Pro
