Re: [SMW-devel] Patches for composer-managed extensions

2014-02-28 Thread Stephan Gambke
Ok. Thanks. On 1 March 2014 02:20, Jeroen De Dauw wrote: > Hey, > >> If no tags for dev versions exist, take latest released and hope for the >> best. Good luck. > > If you want to use a dev version, then use the appropriate branch, such as > master. "dev-master" as version constraint. Using tags

Re: [SMW-devel] Patches for composer-managed extensions

2014-02-28 Thread Jeroen De Dauw
Hey, > If no tags for dev versions exist, take latest released and hope for the best. Good luck. If you want to use a dev version, then use the appropriate branch, such as master. "dev-master" as version constraint. Using tags in this context makes little sense. > Ensure all packages are set to

Re: [SMW-devel] Patches for composer-managed extensions

2014-02-28 Thread Stephan Gambke
So does this sound about right: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:F.trott/Patching_Composer-managed_extensions_on_GitHub ? On 28 February 2014 22:55, Jeroen De Dauw wrote: > Hey, > > It is pretty much the same as for Wikibase - > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikibase/Contribution_workflow > >

Re: [SMW-devel] Patches for composer-managed extensions

2014-02-28 Thread Jeroen De Dauw
Hey, It is pretty much the same as for Wikibase - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikibase/Contribution_workflow Cheers -- Jeroen De Dauw http://www.bn2vs.com Don't panic. Don't be evil. ~=[,,_,,]:3 -- -- Flow-based real-

[SMW-devel] Patches for composer-managed extensions

2014-02-28 Thread Stephan Gambke
Hi, when SRF was managed using WMFs repo and git, my workflow was - git pull, if necessary - git checkout -b foo - hack away - git commit -a - git review What is the recommended workflow now? Cheers, Stephan -- Flow-bas