Re: [SMW-devel] Virtual Instances

> dedicating an entire page to such a small piece of trivia feels like > overkill. Try it (you can use ontoworld.org if you like) and see. This is another topic that's come up before, see the long thread on semediawiki-user Subject: Modeling "third party" relations on Semantic Mediawiki page?

Re: [SMW-devel] Virtual Instances

Sergey Chernyshev wrote: > I think some of this issue was tried to be addressed with n-ary relations > http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/N-ary_relations > > But they were not implemented in the extend it was originally planned - > here's original page on Ontoworld and associated talk page: > http

Re: [SMW-devel] Virtual Instances

I think some of this issue was tried to be addressed with n-ary relations http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/N-ary_relations But they were not implemented in the extend it was originally planned - here's original page on Ontoworld and associated talk page: http://ontoworld.org/wiki/N-ary http://on

Re: [SMW-devel] Virtual Instances

Temlakos wrote: > Jon: > > Your proposal sounds like one for a virtual page of some kind--say, a > "page" that is actually a section, not a true page. Essentially, yes. Perhaps this could be done by having you append an anchor name to any property that applies to the subject of a section instea

Re: [SMW-devel] Virtual Instances

Jon: Your proposal sounds like one for a virtual page of some kind--say, a "page" that is actually a section, not a true page. I have a problem similar to the one you describe for DC Comic "multiverses." Consider:

[SMW-devel] Virtual Instances

It occurs to me that there are often times when you're putting information on a wiki where you're providing information about a lot of related items, all on one page. This happens because while there's enough semantic information involved to warrant a brief summary about the item in question, the