Katrina vanden Heuvel 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/linksets/2010/07/06/ABg8q7D_linkset.html> 

Opinion Writer 


Ukraine needs Russia and the West


(Yannis Behrakis/Reuters) - An armoured fighting vehicle with pro-Russian 
rebels patrols in the streets of the eastern Ukrainian city of Slaviansk on 
Monday evening.


By Katrina vanden Heuvel 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/katrina-vanden-heuvel/2011/02/24/ABMj4XN_page.html>
 , Published: May 13 


Violence in Ukraine is spreading. The Ukrainian military and police are 
splitting apart, a reflection of the fissures in that deeply divided country. 
Pro-Russian separatists are taking over government buildings and police 
stations in eastern Ukraine. Pro-government mobs have burned protesters alive 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/police-38-dead-in-protest-linked-odessa-fire/2014/05/02/9ef44c50-d22c-11e3-a714-be7e7f142085_story.html>
 . The referenda on self-rule 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/separatists-claim-victory-in-eastern-ukraine-kremlin-calls-for-talks-with-kiev-government/2014/05/12/135ceba9-824c-486d-98e1-e1aa49627fa3_story.html>
  cobbled together by pro-Russian movements in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 
deepens the divisions. Zealots on both sides could drive the country into a 
bloody and destructive civil war.

The United States has no direct national security interests at stake in 
Ukraine, but we do have an interest in a united and functional Ukraine that has 
stable relations with its European Union neighbors to the west and with Russia 
to the east. And the United States surely wants to forestall a crisis that 
could disintegrate into civil war, economic collapse and chaos, possibly 
destabilizing a weak European economy.

But if the United States is to help stabilize Ukraine and prevent a much larger 
European crisis, then the American political establishment and much of the 
mainstream media will need a sober reassessment of reality.

U.S. actions over the past several months have defied common sense. Given the 
deep divisions in Ukrainian society and the vital interest Russia has in the 
country, it was a provocative step for the United States to immediately and 
unconditionally recognize as legitimate the government erected out of violent 
protests and in violation of the negotiated agreement for a peaceful 
transition. And it makes no sense to treat Russia’s actions as an existential 
threat to the post-war international order, given that the West needs Russian 
cooperation to stabilize Ukraine both politically and financially.

Not only have the media and political class egged on the administration in a 
rash and destructive foreign policy, but the debate, shamefully inadequate as 
it has been, has had an Alice in Wonderland quality to it. Voices across the 
political spectrum have scorned the president as weak, fulminating about 
forceful action while forswearing any use of U.S. military forces, knowing the 
American people had no appetite for another conflict on the other side of the 
world. 

Leaks from the White House to the New York Times 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/02/world/europe/so-far-us-sanctions-over-ukraine-may-be-inflicting-only-limited-pain-on-russia.html?_r=0>
  suggest that Russia must be treated as a “pariah nation,” in an updated form 
of Cold War containment. This would require isolating the sixth-largest economy 
in the world, one that supplies Europe with more than a quarter of its oil and 
gas 
<http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/03/europes-gas-supply-ukraine-crisis-russsia-pipelines>
  and has growing ties with emerging powers, including China and India. The 
only way to sell that to Americans — much less the Europeans — would be to 
repeat the Dean Acheson formula at the beginning of the Cold War of painting 
the threat “clearer than truth 
<http://carnegieendowment.org/1998/09/14/how-dean-acheson-won-cold-war-statesmanship-morality-and-foreign-policy/4lrj>
 .” Action to deal with the crisis is vital before events on the ground get 
farther out of hand. 

The first step is a return to common sense about basic reality. Ukraine is and 
has been a deeply divided country. Roughly half of the country looks west to 
Europe, and roughly half looks east to Russia for help. 

Russia views its border with Ukraine as vital to its security. Neither the 
United States nor its European allies will go to war with Russia to defend 
Ukraine. Nor will they endlessly support Kiev financially or cover its energy 
bill. Inevitably, the country, if it is to survive, will have to find a way to 
coexist with Russia.

After the chaotic autonomy votes of this past weekend, negotiation could be the 
sole path to prevent Ukraine’s disintegration. It is vital now to do what can 
be done to defuse the crisis on the ground and move to a broader, comprehensive 
settlement. German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s proposal for a multi-party 
roundtable to work out the details of such a plan was almost immediately 
supported by Russian President Vladi­mir Putin (in his barely reported 
statement on May 6 <http://eng.kremlin.ru/transcripts/7143> ). It is critical 
that the United States add its clear support for constructive steps forward.

The parameters of an acceptable outcome are clear and have, in essence, been 
agreed upon by the United States, Russia and the Ukraine authorities in the 
Geneva Declaration of April 17 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/joint-geneva-statement-on-ukraine-from-april-17-the-full-text/2014/04/17/89bd0ac2-c654-11e3-9f37-7ce307c56815_story.html>
 , updated by Merkel’s “roundtable 
<http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2014/05/12/world/europe/12reuters-ukraine-crisis-roundtable.html?ref=world>
 .” Together these two measures call for all parties to disarm, while convening 
a national dialogue to consider a new constitutional arrangement that will 
provide for greater regional autonomy. The authorities in Kiev agree that 
regional authority is vital for the country to have any hope of cleaning out 
the corruption that has impoverished it. The premature presidential election 
scheduled for the end of May will be contested in much of eastern Ukraine. 
Hopefully, whoever emerges in the election will support the roundtable leading 
to constitutional reforms; that would provide the basis for nationwide 
agreement on new elections to create a legitimate national government. 
International bodies such as the United Nations and the Organization for 
Security and Cooperation in Europe could provide the space for the national 
dialogue.

A constitutional settlement inside Ukraine will solve nothing if the country 
remains a pawn in U.S.-Russian jockeying. Here, the bipartisan establishment 
dream of extending NATO to Russia’s borders needs to be abandoned. Instead, the 
West should accept that Ukraine will remain independent of NATO, while Russia 
accepts that it will remain a unified independent country. Similarly, the 
European Union should abandon the effort to force Ukraine to choose between 
Russia and Europe. Instead, the E.U. should embrace the compromise put forward 
by Moscow that Ukraine should be part of both the European market and the 
Russian customs federation. If the country has any chance of recovery, 
assistance from both Russia and the West will be needed.

This outcome will be possible only if common sense can find some traction in 
Washington and in media coverage of the crisis. The United States needs to get 
over its post-Cold War triumphalism: It has neither the resources nor the 
mandate to “police” the world. Countries such as Ukraine need to find their own 
way to protect their independence while recognizing the reality of living with 
powerful neighbors. The United States, its allies and global institutions and 
opinion can help make those arrangements more or less stable. But we should be 
wary of risking the lives of others to fulfill the fantasies of those blind to 
the limits of our power or our military.

Read more from Katrina vanden Heuvel’s archive 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/katrina-vanden-heuvel/2011/02/24/ABMj4XN_page.html>
  or follow her on Twitter <https://twitter.com/KatrinaNation> . 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/katrina-vanden-heuvel-ukraine-needs-russia-and-the-west/2014/05/13/1f269790-da19-11e3-bda1-9b46b2066796_story.html

Reply via email to