Noel J. Bergman wrote:
If you are proposing that we add:
I'm suggesting that if you are hitting a performance issue because of
the way a protocol handler works, and you see the RFC mandates
something, you should consider adjusting your design accordingly.
void remove(Collection);
Sure.
to
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
I suggest then to modify sqlResources.xml accordingly in CVS to become mail attributes enabled by default. Some notes (in wiki? in the faq?) should be written to help administrators enable existing servers that have db based repositories (I can do that when back
vincenzo2003/08/18 08:42:36
Modified:src/conf Tag: branch_2_1_fcs sqlResources.xml
Log:
DB repositories become mail attributes enabled by default.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.16.4.7 +0 -20
vincenzo2003/08/18 08:43:54
Modified:src/conf sqlResources.xml
Log:
DB repositories become mail attributes enabled by default.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +0 -20 james-server/src/conf/sqlResources.xml
Index: sqlResources.xml
Jason,
Great! I will quite happily change the POP3 handler (and the other
repositories) if someone wants me to.
That would be great. :-) First we've one issue to resolve.
I think that we're agreed on void remove(Collection). There seems to be a
bit of a dispute over the contents of the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
