fetchmail broken out of the box (was: Re: Missing Blocks are Fatal)

2003-10-23 Thread Kenny Smith
Hi all, Ok, I've downloaded a fresh version of james-2.2.0a15. I had to manually add mail_1_3.jar and activation.jar to the $JAMES_HOME/lib dir and I was able to build successfully. I cd'd to dist/james-2.2.0a15 and typed: bin/run.sh and it failed with the following error: ---

Re: James Version Incorrect (was: Re: Missing Blocks are Fatal)

2003-10-23 Thread Kenny Smith
Ah, *smacks forehead* thanks. Kenny Noel J. Bergman wrote: Aha! :-) You want *branch*_2_1_fcs, not *build_2_1_fcs :-) --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: James Version Incorrect (was: Re: Missing Blocks are Fatal)

2003-10-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Yes, I did a: checkout -r build_2_1_fcs james-server Aha! :-) You want *branch*_2_1_fcs, not *build_2_1_fcs :-) --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Missing Blocks are Fatal (IBM java ok?)

2003-10-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I uninstalled the IBM J2SDK 1.4.1 installation I was using and installed > the Sun J2SDK 1.4.1 and it's not having the SHA MessageDigest problem > anymore. I have not tried IBM 1.4.1. I have successfully used IBM 1.3.1. --- Noel --

James Version Incorrect (was: Re: Missing Blocks are Fatal)

2003-10-23 Thread Kenny Smith
Hi Noel, Yes, I did a: checkout -r build_2_1_fcs james-server and when I built, it was put in a 2.1 directory and the banner it displayed while starting up was 2.1 also. Kenny Are you saying that when you do a clean build it reports as James 2.1? That should be james-2.2.0a15. --- Noel ---

Re: Missing Blocks are Fatal (IBM java ok?)

2003-10-23 Thread Kenny Smith
Hi Noel et al, I uninstalled the IBM J2SDK 1.4.1 installation I was using and installed the Sun J2SDK 1.4.1 and it's not having the SHA MessageDigest problem anymore. I was under the impression that the IBM j2sdk worked with James just as well as the Sun. Am I wrong in that assumption? Kenny

RE: Missing Blocks are Fatal

2003-10-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Kenny, I just ran it myself from a clean build: Welcome root. HELP for a list of commands listusers Existing accounts 0 adduser kenny stuff User kenny added listusers Existing accounts 1 user: kenny The sign-on from James was: Phoenix 4.0.1 James 2.2.0a15 Remote Manager S

Re: Missing Blocks are Fatal

2003-10-23 Thread Kenny Smith
Hi Noel, I moved my current installation away and performed the following steps and received the same SHA MessageDigest not available: # cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic login # cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic checkout -r build_2_1_fcs james-server --

RE: Missing Blocks are Fatal

2003-10-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I kept the config that came with the new installation and went section > by section adding stuff from my old one into the new one. Try running the release as-is to test. I just tried that, again, and it works fine. --- Noel

[PATCH] RemoteDelivery support for multiple delayTimes

2003-10-23 Thread Søren Hilmer
This patch implements multiple delayTimes in RemoteDelivery, for that to work SpoolRepository, and implementing classes has also been modified, as have the sqlResources.xml. The format for each delayTime entry is attempts and unit are optional. Attempt is the number of times the delay is used.

Re: Missing Blocks are Fatal

2003-10-23 Thread Kenny Smith
Hi Noel, I kept the config that came with the new installation and went section by section adding stuff from my old one into the new one. Kenny Noel J. Bergman wrote: I actually did find the james-fetchmail.xml after looking for awhile, but James refused to see it when starting up. I don't know

RE: Missing Blocks are Fatal

2003-10-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I actually did find the james-fetchmail.xml after looking for awhile, > but James refused to see it when starting up. I don't know why. My guess is that you kept your old configuration, and didn't add a reference to fetchmail. See the current configuration file for how we use XML entities.

Re: Missing Blocks are Fatal

2003-10-23 Thread Kenny Smith
Hi Noel, I actually did find the james-fetchmail.xml after looking for awhile, but James refused to see it when starting up. I don't know why. I've commented out the fetchmail block in the assembly.xml and James is starting just fine for me now. Kenny Noel J. Bergman wrote: Kenny, Block nam

RE: Missing Blocks are Fatal

2003-10-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Kenny, > Block named "fetchmail" implements Configurable, but has no > corresponding in config.xml). > In the 2.2 version I pulled from CVS, the default config has > an entity reference to fetchmailConfig which should point to > ../apps/james/conf/james-fetchmail.xml, but that file wasn't > inclu

cvs commit: james-server build.xml

2003-10-23 Thread noel
noel2003/10/23 12:00:45 Modified:.Tag: branch_2_1_fcs build.xml Log: james 2.2.0a15 test build Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.116.2.20 +2 -2 james-server/build.xml Index: build.xml ===

cvs commit: james-server/src/conf james-fetchmail.xml

2003-10-23 Thread noel
noel2003/10/23 11:59:32 Modified:src/conf Tag: branch_2_1_fcs james-fetchmail.xml Log: typo: mis-matched tags Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.1.2.5 +1 -1 james-server/src/conf/Attic/james-fetchmail.xml

Re: Missing Blocks are Fatal

2003-10-23 Thread Kenny Smith
Ok... but isn't James telling the container which blocks to configure? Doesn't james exist somewhere in the stack trace? (I can't actually find that out because the stack trace is so long it gets truncated with ". 23 more." Kenny Stephen McConnell wrote: The problem you are seeing is g

RE: Missing Blocks are Fatal

2003-10-23 Thread Steve Short
You can do this - you have to remove them from the assembly.xml file as well. Steve > -Original Message- > From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:17 AM > To: James Developers List > Subject: Missing Blocks are Fatal > > > Hi all, > > I'm tryi

Re: Missing Blocks are Fatal

2003-10-23 Thread Stephen McConnell
The problem you are seeing is generated by the container you are using. I.e. it isn't a James issue. Stephen. Kenny Smith wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to get a new installation of 2.2-dev working and I'm running into this error: org.apache.excalibur.containerkit.lifecycle.LifecycleException: Com

Missing Blocks are Fatal

2003-10-23 Thread Kenny Smith
Hi all, I'm trying to get a new installation of 2.2-dev working and I'm running into this error: org.apache.excalibur.containerkit.lifecycle.LifecycleException: Component named "fetchmail" failed to pass through the Configuration stage. (Reason: org.apache.avalon.framework.configuration.Confi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24053] - Redirect mailet: MIME-encoded subject is changed event if a prefix is not specified

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [proposal] Doco

2003-10-23 Thread Kenny Smith
Hi Stefano, I think the overall concept for this project is pretty cool and very well thought out. The one part that stands out to me as a weak link is the "reply" vs. "reply to all" mechanism. It seems prone to human errors and to things like vacation messages. How would conflicts be handled

Re: Rationale behind explicit setLastUpdated in MailImpl writeobject sought.

2003-10-23 Thread Søren Hilmer
Ahh, now I fully understand Noels comments. I started doing accept(Filter) in JDBCSpoolRepository and we do not have complete MaiImpl's in there and even the misused errormessage is not in PendingMessage. But as it is in the underlying db I will just change the sql query and PendingMessage. I

[proposal] Doco

2003-10-23 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
First of all, sorry for the massive cross-post, but I think it is going to be a great opportunity for all the communities involved to show off their potentials with the apache infrastructure. The proposal is about the creation of a content management system for apache projects, codenamed "Doco"

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24053] New: - Redirect mailet: MIME-encoded subject is changed event if a prefix is not specified

2003-10-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Exposing classes with Merlin

2003-10-23 Thread Larry Weber
"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The level of exposure of these classes to client code is a function of > the container support for isolation. If your running James in Phoneix > then these classes will be exposed. If you running under Merlin then > they will be isolated to the imple

Re: Maximum number of users

2003-10-23 Thread Danny Angus
The limitations _should_ be imposed only by external systems, perhaps by the number of directories which can be created within a single directory by the filesystem (large but finite) or the maximum number of permutations of the primary key field in the users db table. (very large indeed, but al

Re: Rationale behind explicit setLastUpdated in MailImpl writeobject sought.

2003-10-23 Thread Danny Angus
> But to address the fundamental challenge, I would say this is a good use > of mail attributes. Sounds like we would need to provide a query > interface on the repository for this, but really you want to set a date > on the mail that is not last updated, but independent of any data we > sto