Hi Darrell Sorry I haven't replied sooner, but I'm a bit stretched at the moment...
The IMAP implementation using your IMAP2 proposal is the one I'm working from as it seems to be the most complete and it has lots of nice tests. I need to do the following: Add attributes to the User object(s). I have done the file: implementation as this is trivial. I am in the process of doing the db: implementation now. - Once this is done I will have somewhere to store all the required mailbox names etc. The rest should hopefully fall into place as I can use username.mboxname when I store data in a user repository. I will then be in a position to mod the IMAP code to persist the data properly. I'm fairly sure I know what needs to be done in the Imap code to make this work. The IMAP tests you provide will be critical in anything I do here, so the more tests the better :) -- Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Darrell DeBoer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 November 2003 12:57 > To: James Developers List > Subject: Re: CURRENT direction for James :-) > > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:26 pm, Jason Webb wrote: > > I can't remember the outcome of a recent conversation about what > > happens to V3 Will the current head become a branch? > > Will the branch_2_1_fcs become the head? > > > > I would assume that next release will be 2.3 and include the latest > > Avalon as well. I hope to complete the user attribute work > in the next > > 2 months (work and home pressures allowing) > > > > -- Jason > > Hi Jason, > > I've been doing a bit of tinkering of late on the Imap2 > proposal codebase. > I've modified the Protocol testing so that I can specify > tests for the > interaction of 2 (or more) concurrent sessions - handling > these cases is the > main complexity in the imap implementation. > > I'm holding off committing until I've faxed off my CLA - I'm > sure this is > legally required, but mostly this is just to force me to get > around to it ;). > > I'd like to know where you got to with the persistent Imap > store. There > doesn't seem to be anything new in the proposal in this > regard. Maybe I can > help get this finished more quickly? > -- > ciao, > Daz > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
