Am I far from the true if I say that the configure() method is passed a
Configuration object which is an object (DOM) representation of the James
config file?
Marco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional co
No, I hope I could skip, as I have so many other things to read. I'm going
through the docs now.
Marcl
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Short" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Marco Tedone"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:09 PM
Marco,
Have you read the Avalon docs yet ?
http://avalon.apache.org/doc/index.html
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Marco Tedone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:54 PM
> To: James-Dev
> Subject: James development
>
>
> May I know the function of the foll
> May I know the function of the following methods:
I don't believe that I could explain it any shorter or more clearly than the
docs, so see http://avalon.apache.org/.
As you say, they are lifecycle methods for Avalon components. Your best
bet, if you don't want to read the docs, would be to lo
May I know the function of the following methods:
contextualize()
compose()
configure()
initialize()
I think these are lifecycle methods in phoenix but I don't know their
functions and when those methods are invoked.
Thanks,
Marco
May I ask which functionalities you felt as needed by the RMI manager?
Marco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can you layout the differences for those of us who haven't
> spent as much time looking at this as you?
Sure. But how long do you think I've been looking at it ? (rhetorical)
;)
> From what you are saying, if a monitor has a metric that
> isn't filled in by a service, it sits empty. And if
Steve Short wrote:
> > I thought, from Chapter 8 of the JMX (JSR 77) specification
> > that SNMP is supported directly by JMX.
> There's a difference between JMX and JSR 77. JMX is the basic
> management API and is covered by JSR 3.
> JSR 77 is for management of the J2EE platform. It does includ
Noel,
> I thought, from Chapter 8 of the JMX (JSR 77) specification
> that SNMP is supported directly by JMX.
There's a difference between JMX and JSR 77. JMX is the basic
management API and is covered by JSR 3. It does not include any remote
access capability at all, it does allow for remote a
Steve,
I don't know JMX well enough yet, but your proposal seems good. The only
thing I would like for you to clarify comes from:
> Eventually we could provide several implementations of the
> service one for JMX, one for SNMP.
I thought, from Chapter 8 of the JMX (JSR 77) specification that SN
Guys,
Shall I go ahead with this or not? I need to be working on this for our
product this week and I'd really like to contribute to James.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Short
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 4:26 PM
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Monitoring in Jame
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 December 2003 17:11
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: Regarding BUG 24885: RemoteDelivery only tries
> one of multiple A record
>
>
> Søren Hilmer wrote:
> > rawDNSLookup needs to be called twic
Søren Hilmer wrote:
> rawDNSLookup needs to be called twice. I am adding a
> DNSServer.findARecords method to do it
Why not use InetAddress.getAllByName(String host)? It will get all of the
IP addresses associated with the host.
> On Friday 05 December 2003 16:30, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > The
On Saturday 06 December 2003 00:22, Richard O. Hammer wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Søren Hilmer wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >>>So it is handling a multihomed destination that needs to be addressed.
>
> I want to make sure I understand this issue. I've put some debugging
> statements into org.apache.
On Friday 05 December 2003 16:30, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> The return is a Collection of String objects. Each one is currently of the
> form "host", but if we were to handle multi-homed hosts by using "host/IP",
> it seems to me that we could either parse it directly, or change the way we
> cons
Noel,
Yes, it must have been held up in some mail-spooler (probably not a James
based one).
--Søren
On Friday 05 December 2003 18:21, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Søren,
>
> For some reason, you've answered twice. Was the first one from this
> morning the one that you e-mailed me to say you though
16 matches
Mail list logo
