Re: Last update 2002 ?

2004-02-17 Thread Serge Knystautas
Noel J. Bergman wrote: It would help to have us weed out what's already done on this page, or at least mark an "as of version". Otherwise I'm happy to take the scratch-your-itch approach to development and see where it takes us. :) Should we start to migrate the todo.xml content to a JIRA Roadma

RE: [patch] Maildir + LDAP + SMTPACL + Virtual Domains

2004-02-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> > > Posting this for third time :) please just say you are not > > > interested do not keep silent > > Alex, are you not receiving your e-mail? > Or not subscribed to the James Developers List? He was cc'ed on a number of the messages. Besides which, I checked. ;-) --- Noel

RE: Last update 2002 ?

2004-02-17 Thread Steve Brewin
Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Should we start to migrate the todo.xml content to a JIRA Roadmap? > +1 And just have the TODO link on the web-site point there. -- Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c

RE: [patch] Maildir + LDAP + SMTPACL + Virtual Domains

2004-02-17 Thread Steve Brewin
Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > Posting this for third time :) please just say you are not > interested > > do not keep silent > > Alex, are you not receiving your e-mail? Your patch has been > discussed > multiple times, and parts of it were mentioned in the roll > out plan for the > next sever

RE: Last update 2002 ?

2004-02-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> It would help to have us weed out what's already done on this page, or > at least mark an "as of version". Otherwise I'm happy to take the > scratch-your-itch approach to development and see where it takes us. :) Should we start to migrate the todo.xml content to a JIRA Roadmap? ---

RE: [patch] Maildir + LDAP + SMTPACL + Virtual Domains

2004-02-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Posting this for third time :) please just say you are not interested > do not keep silent Alex, are you not receiving your e-mail? Your patch has been discussed multiple times, and parts of it were mentioned in the roll out plan for the next several releases. The SMTPACL portion spawned an en

[patch] Maildir + LDAP + SMTPACL + Virtual Domains

2004-02-17 Thread Alex Zhukov
Posting this for third time :) please just say you are not interested do not keep silent Hi all james hackers! I have been looking for an opportunity to migrate to James for a long time, but james lacked several features I really needed. So I decided to write a patch to add some (still not all)

[jira] Commented: (JAMES-144) POP3Handler breaks with message numbers out of bounds

2004-02-17 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Brill Pappin Created: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 6:52 AM Body: Update, this appears to happen when the mail store is empty (0 messages in the mailbox). - View this

[jira] Commented: (JAMES-144) POP3Handler breaks with message numbers out of bounds

2004-02-17 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Brill Pappin Created: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 6:49 AM Body: I think I've got the same problem, though I haven't been diggin in the code (it just looks tp be the same). Some config info: - James 2.1.3 - JDK 1.4.x - FreeBSD In c

RE: RCPT-TO value??

2004-02-17 Thread Danny Angus
> are only MailAdress'es from the RCPT-TO added to this collection, or is > there another way of getting addresses stuck in there? You want to add items to this collection? d. *** The information in this e-mail is conf

FW: RCPT-TO value??

2004-02-17 Thread Steve Brewin
-Original Message- From: Steve Brewin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 February 2004 14:40 To: 'Philipp Salzgeber' Subject: RE: RCPT-TO value?? Philipp Salzgeber wrote: > > > hi Steve, > > are only MailAdress'es from the RCPT-TO added to this > collection, or is > there another way of

RE: RCPT-TO value??

2004-02-17 Thread Philipp Salzgeber
hi Steve, are only MailAdress'es from the RCPT-TO added to this collection, or is there another way of getting addresses stuck in there? thanks Philipp > -Original Message- > From: Steve Brewin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 14:56 > To: 'James Developers L

RE: RCPT-TO value??

2004-02-17 Thread Steve Brewin
Philipp Salzgeber wrote: > > > hi, > > is there a way to access the parameter given in the RCPT-TO SMTP > command? The recipient from RCPT-TO is added to the Collection answered by org.apache.james.core.MailImpl.getRecipients() -- Steve -

RCPT-TO value??

2004-02-17 Thread Philipp Salzgeber
hi, is there a way to access the parameter given in the RCPT-TO SMTP command? cheers, philipp - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JNDI Repository

2004-02-17 Thread Danny Angus
> Read this I mean.. Read this: http://james.apache.org/contribute.html *** The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible fo

Re: JNDI Repository

2004-02-17 Thread Danny Angus
> On the other hand the telnet interface is a good idea, but, at this moment, > the functionality supported is limited, It would be interesting an interface > more interactive, at least in a few important commandas like "ADD", I need > more data for a User, Complete Name, Address, Telephone, e

Re: JNDI Repository

2004-02-17 Thread Danny Angus
> OK, I would like to help in this task, if it is possible. Where is the forum > to discuss about the new architecture, in the Wiki ? Here on this mailing list. d. *** The information in this e-mail is confidential and

[jira] Created: (JAMES-153) Looping MessageException causes system stall

2004-02-17 Thread jira
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=JAMES-153 Here is an overview of the issue: ---

Re: JNDI Repository

2004-02-17 Thread Roberto Sánchez \(QO\)
> > ROberto, > > Noel wrote > > It is possible that once we start to integrate with JNDI that the entire > > user repository area will change. > > I would encourage you to make your JNDI work as independant as possible of James, so that it can more easily be used when we change the way James handle

Re: JNDI Repository

2004-02-17 Thread Roberto Sánchez \(QO\)
> Roberto, > > This is good, and we welcome contributions, but you should know that Alex > Zhukov has also already done a similar thing. Have you looked at it? Yes, I saw de Alex Zhukov's LDAP repository, but it supposed several things that did not fit well with my "production server", for exampl