Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The reason I mentioned Jakarta Commons was because of a thread back in
March*. There has been some interest in Multipart MIME there. But I think
it might be best to develop it here, and then consider moving it to Commons.
Frankly, I don't want to be held to a coordinated sc
Serge,
The reason I mentioned Jakarta Commons was because of a thread back in
March*. There has been some interest in Multipart MIME there. But I think
it might be best to develop it here, and then consider moving it to Commons.
Frankly, I don't want to be held to a coordinated schedule with Com
Serge Knystautas wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > The whole package is about 50K of code. We should probably
> import this
> > through the Incubator as a pass-through for James. I'm not
> sure if it would
> > be best to add it as org.apache.james.util.mime, and
> perhaps eventually
> > migrate
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
To quote Joe: "It transparently decodes Base64 and quoted-printable on
demand (i.e., doesn't base64-decode that 5MB binary attachment until you
actually ask for its bytes). It successfully deals with the
"torture-test.mbox" message posted by Mark Crispin:
http://groups.googl
