The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Noel J. Bergman (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 7:38 PM
Comment:
Schedule fix for the next release candidate.
Changes:
Version changed to 2.1.3
Version changed to 2.2.0RC1
Ver
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 08:56 pm, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Steve and Vincenzo:
>
> This means we will revisit the PostgreSQL issues raised by Arjan and Russ,
> and try to add the additional configuration elements from Jason Tepoorten.
I did want to follow up to that one, but i haven't found the tim
Steve and Vincenzo:
For the moment, we're planning to keep the current code as close to what it
is as possible, but Vincenzo is modifying the XML so that it tell us to
treat the column as bytes, blob or input stream. Down the road, we may have
use of that flexibility. It would be nice to stream
> I got a notification email at 12:27 AM.
Your received it directly because you are a watcher on that issue. Jira was
updated over the weekend, and broke e-mail notification because it is adding
Precedence: bulk, which causes our list manager to discard the message.
--- Noel
--
Vincenzo,
I don't have any time to help out this week - but next week I will be able to test on
postgresql, Oracle, DB2 and mysql if you still need it.
I was thinking of a similar solution to yours, except that I was thinking of adding DB
Helper classes and configuring the helper class name in
I got a notification email at 12:27 AM.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 9:10 AM
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Reopened Jira JAMES-247
>
>
> Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
> > Yesterday, experimen
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
Yesterday, experimenting RC3, I had to reopen the JAMES-247 Jira entry, upgrading it to "blocking".
I'll look into why a notice didn't get through. Thanks for catching this.
--
Serge Knystautas
President
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokite
I wrote and tested code that allows to specify in sqlResources.xml whether blobs
should/can be used or not with a database product, and behaves accordingly.
As I was there, I wrote it in a generalized way, so that it could be used in the
future in similar cases.
Here follows an xml snippet from
Not a problem, except that the relay servers don't particularly care what your requirements are. In any case, I believe javamail and James should support 8-bit in preparation for when (if) the 7-bit-only relay servers disappear. It's never good to be a bottleneck. Just keep it in mind, that the 7-b
Hi Lawrence,
the problem is we need a 8Bit MIME compliant e-mail server... the
requirements say so :-(
cheers
philipp
Lawrence A. Weber wrote:
Hate to mention this but the SMTP 8-bit line seems to be a request, not
a requirement (like a number of other SMTP lines). So it doesn't really
matter w
Hate to mention this but the SMTP 8-bit line seems to be a request, not a requirement (like a number of other SMTP lines). So it doesn't really matter whether James supports it. This comes from experience of sending Japanese emails. There was always a relay server somewhere between the US and Japan
Hi,
what is the status of 8-bit MIME support in James?
I read that James handles 8-bit messages correctly:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01721.html
and I want to test that...
In com.sun.mail.SMTPMessage there is a method .setAllow8bitMIME(boolean)
but if the server does not respo
Yesterday, experimenting RC3, I had to reopen the JAMES-247 Jira entry, upgrading it
to "blocking".
For some reason (could somebody look at this ???) no email was sent by Jira (or at
least I didn't receive it), so I'm sending this one, commenting the problem.
I'm inserting the following comment
13 matches
Mail list logo
