noel2004/08/19 23:44:47
Modified:src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets Tag:
branch_2_1_fcs LocalDelivery.java
Log:
remove unused commented out code that I forgot to delete before previous commit
Revision ChangesPath
No r
Hes Siemelink wrote:
> I hope I will have time to test the release candidates against the
> infamous 'return-path twice in header' test cases (bug james-281).
Please do. :-) The code for handling the Return-Path header is totally different now.
> It would be great if fixes could be included for
noel2004/08/19 20:48:15
Modified:src/java/org/apache/james/core Tag: branch_2_1_fcs
MimeMessageWrapper.java
src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets Tag:
branch_2_1_fcs LocalDelivery.java
Log:
Additional adjustment
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Noel J. Bergman
Created: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 8:40 PM
Body:
This bug was identical to JAMES-236, except for being in the gateway server iterator
instead of the MX hosts iterator in the DNSServer code.
noel2004/08/19 20:39:35
Modified:src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets Tag:
branch_2_1_fcs RemoteDelivery.java
Log:
Fix JAMES-318. JAMES-318 was identical to JAMES-236 except for the location of the
code. The fix is essentially the same one used t
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Noel J. Bergman
Created: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 8:23 PM
Body:
There is a different fix for this in CVS. It matches the fix already made for the
same reason in the DNSServer code. The iterator really should not return true if
> It only knows the preferred order for headers created with the
> InternetHeaders() constructor. It does not appear to know
> about the preferred order when an InternetHeaders object is
> created from a stream.
I shouldn't need to know this, but IIRC (I'm not testing this specifically):
Inter
Vincenzo,
Those jars ARE in the test builds. I'm verifying that we want them in CVS
or not.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Thoughts? Has anyone other than Danny had time to look at the reverse path
handling changes?
I'll have a look at it tomorrow.
Vincenzo, you need for me to commit these bounce castle
jars that I've got in the JAMES 2.1.1 test builds, right? Anything else
anyone can think o
Bill Shannon wrote:
> Richard O. Hammer wrote:
> > When a SMTP server receives a message it needs to add a Received: header
> > at the top of the headers. But InternetHeaders does not seem to offer
> > any way to add a header specifically at the top of the list. This class
> > seems to offer no w
> I didn't noticed that subtle bug you mentioned
I'm still fighting it, but I think I've got it licked. The problem is in
the lack of control we have with the InternetHeaders class. It has a lot of
undocumented semantics that can really get in the way, and cause headers to
get out of order if yo
Hi Noel
I hope I will have time to test the release candidates against the infamous
'return-path twice in header' test cases (bug james-281).
It would be great if fixes could be included for 'space in path name' (james-307) and
the NullpointerException in RemoteDelivery (james-318 -- seems to
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Hes Siemelink
Created: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 4:10 AM
Body:
Messages do get lost when this occurs.
Looking at the exception handling in RemoteDelivery.run() it makes sense, but I think
it is unwanted behavior.
I think the bes
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Hes Siemelink
Created: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 4:04 AM
Body:
For jdk 1.3 I would propose the following:
/**
* Utility method to extract URL from file in safe manner.
*
* @param file the file
* @return the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project james-server has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1 p
> Thoughts? Has anyone other than Danny had time to look at the reverse
path
> handling changes? Vincenzo, you need for me to commit these bounce castle
I also read it carefully and it seems to be correct (but I didn't noticed
that subtle bug you mentioned). However the hardest part is to justif
16 matches
Mail list logo
