Re: [James-NG] Avalon-free James proposal and reference implementation

[Alexander Zhukov]

Hes Siemelink wrote:
Alexander Zhukov wrote:
You might ask: "what do you mean, man?" :)
Example:
BAD:
class MyComponent ... {
    init() {
       context = InitialContext();
       Service s = context.lookup(...);
    }
    run() {
       s.doSomething();
    }
}
GOOD: (acceptable but not an excelent design solution)
class MyComponent {
    public MyComponent(Context ctx, ...) {
        Service s = ctx.lookup()
    }
    run() {
       s.doSomething();
    }
}

You example is best-case scenario
CSI is not a good name though :) because Service in your example is just 
a dependency, which means CDI name still applies

And if I understand correctly, CSI (Constructor Service Injection ;-) 
would be

class MyComponent {
   Service service;
   public MyComponent(Service service) {
       this.service = service;
   }
   run() {
      service.doSomething();
   }
}
I think the latter approach is cleanest from an OO-modeling pointof 
view, but what matters most is that the approach is consistent 
throughout an application or library.

Cheers,
   Hes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]