Serge Knystautas wrote:
> > "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > One of the big arguments against Groovy in JamesNG was
> > > the IDE support,
> > > and it seems not to hold in the near future.
> > ?? Where did you hear that? Groovy works fine with
> > BSF, and there was some
> > w
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:23:41 -0500
"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the big arguments against Groovy in JamesNG was
the IDE support,
and it seems not to hold in the near future.
?? Where did you hear that? Groovy works fine with
BSF, and there was some
work on BSF support.
N
> One of the big arguments against Groovy in JamesNG was the IDE support,
> and it seems not to hold in the near future.
?? Where did you hear that? Groovy works fine with BSF, and there was some
work on BSF support.
--- Noel
---
Hi,
One of the big arguments against Groovy in JamesNG was the IDE support,
and it seems not to hold in the near future.
I just found this work in progress, and it looks very promissing:
http://groovy.codehaus.org/IntelliJ+Plugin
Ahmed.
--
