> No, I see (as you) JavaBean==POJO, but CDI!=JavaBean. And I
> prefer using the
> JavaBean approach instead of CDI.
> My concern is that CDI does not facilitate optional
> properties very well.
> If you have some POJO, with just 2 optional properties that
> will lead to 4
> constructors!! This is
I can contribute ANTLR-based parsers for SEARCH and FETCH (although
FETCH is already implemented in imap2), if anyone is interested.
Jason Webb wrote:
They are two separate proposals. V2 is the more recent and (I think) a
slightly more complete protocol implementation. V2 also comes with some nic
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 08:41 +0200, Steen Jansdal wrote:
> Yes, I have found that. What I was looking for was
> the svn url, since the "Source code (SVN)" link on
> the site gives an "unknown location" error.
I'm using, https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory for Apache
directory or you can use
> -Original Message-
> From: Web Design by DraegoonZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 April 2005 16:23
> To: server-dev@james.apache.org
> Subject: IMAP
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Just downloaded the James source.
>
> I'm interested in helping finish the IMAP implementation.
Cool! I have s
Hey guys,
Just downloaded the James source.
I'm interested in helping finish the IMAP implementation.
What is the difference between the two IMAP proposals?
Are they two separate proposals? Or is v2 the second version of the first?
Thanks
