Hi,
i wrote a mailet thats split the email in single emails per recipient.
But sometimes i get this error for example:
We were unable to deliver the attached message because of an error in
the mail server.
Message details:
Subject: FAILED: AS29562
Sent date: Fri Mar 10 06:51:48 CET 2006
It would not make any sence if the whould not accept the email..
Am Donnerstag, den 09.03.2006, 14:45 -0800 schrieb Ken Lin:
> Stefano:
>
> Great to hear from your experience. It sounds a lot of effort to become a
> committer.
>
> Here is the open relay testing site that I used:
Stefano:
Thanks for pointing out. I was looking at the older version of the SMTP RFC.
I will let you know once the code is ready.
Ken
Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ken Lin wrote:
> Stefano:
> I went ahead and tested a few other ISP and corporation's email. It seems
> wh
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-442?page=all ]
Bernd Fondermann updated JAMES-442:
---
Attachment: postage1.1.patch
fix minor bugs. incremental patch.
> [TOOL] Stress Test Tool
> ---
>
> Key: JAMES-442
>
Ken Lin wrote:
Stefano:
I went ahead and tested a few other ISP and corporation's email. It seems
when SMTP authentication is not established, many directly reject any mail
with sender containing the designated domain name. Here are the servers I
tested that rejected all spoof:
Stefano:
Great to hear from your experience. It sounds a lot of effort to become a
committer.
Here is the open relay testing site that I used:
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html
This appears to be pretty popular as it showed up as the top link on google
for "mail relay test".
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-124?page=comments#action_12369626 ]
Soren Hilmer commented on JAMES-124:
I totally follow Noels view. We allready have something like this in the
FromRepository mailet, where any mail received by this mailet,
- Original Message -
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 1:53 AM
Subject: RE: MimeMessage handling optimizations/changes for 2.3.0a2
Markus Kühn wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I'd be inclined to migrate to OSGi at
Ken Lin wrote:
Maybe this method of "spoofing" users has been overlooked. Even if James has
SMTP turned on, I can impersonate any user of the server and send another user an email
without any authentication. In a way, it seems to be a security hole open by default
unless people apply your sec
Stefano:
Thanks! I tested the configuration and found that it works.
Maybe this method of "spoofing" users has been overlooked. Even if James has
SMTP turned on, I can impersonate any user of the server and send another user
an email without any authentication. In a way, it seems to be a se
10 matches
Mail list logo
