1) What are the benefits of inverting the queue <=> processor relation?
It seems less clear than the current way and I don't see specific
advantages.
2) Are you willing to actually implement this or is this just a discussion?
I'm +1 to experiment and refactor the code to add some of the featur
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-522?page=comments#action_12414751 ]
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini commented on JAMES-522:
-
I would keep things as now, because this was the intended behaviour. If
n, with n > 0, the desired behaviour
Author: vincenzo
Date: Mon Jun 5 06:48:27 2006
New Revision: 411787
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411787&view=rev
Log:
1) Added a (commented) ClamAVScan mailet entry.
2) Added a (commented) SMIMESign mailet entry.
3) Added a (commented) AttachmentFileNameIs check for potential infected
a
Author: vincenzo
Date: Mon Jun 5 06:49:57 2006
New Revision: 411789
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411789&view=rev
Log:
1) Added a (commented) ClamAVScan mailet entry.
2) Added a (commented) SMIMESign mailet entry.
3) Added a (commented) AttachmentFileNameIs check for potential infected
a
Author: vincenzo
Date: Mon Jun 5 08:18:14 2006
New Revision: 411812
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411812&view=rev
Log:
Minor change to the notice text to be sent in case over quota is met.
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/conf/james-config.xml
Modified: james/server/trunk/src/conf/j
Author: vincenzo
Date: Mon Jun 5 08:20:18 2006
New Revision: 411813
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411813&view=rev
Log:
Minor change to the notice text to be sent in case over quota is met.
Modified:
james/server/branches/v2.3/src/conf/james-config.xml
Modified: james/server/branches
Hi Serge,
why you want this at all ? What is the idea behind this feature ? Cause
we cannot add/remove matchers/mailets dynamicly from RemoteManager it
seems useless for me.
bye
Norman
Am Sonntag, den 04.06.2006, 16:14 + schrieb Norman Maurer (JIRA):
> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/b
Hi!
before starting a discussion about pro/contra jMock: Are there any
license issues using it in Apache projects? It looks like a very liberal
custom license.
(I made the experience that this should always be the first question)
Joachim
-
On 6/5/06, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
before starting a discussion about pro/contra jMock: Are there any
license issues using it in Apache projects? It looks like a very liberal
custom license.
(I made the experience that this should always be the first question)
Seems like a ve
It seems a standard BSD license.
Compatible ;-)
Stefano
Joachim Draeger wrote:
Hi!
before starting a discussion about pro/contra jMock: Are there any
license issues using it in Apache projects? It looks like a very liberal
custom license.
(I made the experience that this should always be t
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-7?page=comments#action_12414845
]
Julian Mehnle commented on JSPF-7:
--
I hope this hasn't been forgotten. What's the status of jSPF?
> Send openspf.org the link of this project on public release
>
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Hi
I think there is a lot of merit in coming up with a new queueing mechanism
and I know this has been discussed on and off for awhile. Still, I think
that before launching into concepts we should explain the benefits any
proposed change is seeking to achieve. Without putti
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Norman,
As far as I know, it will be you, me, Danny and Vincenzo. I will arrive on
Saturday and leave on the Wednesday after ApacheCon.
I'll be here too!
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Hi!
I understand Lock as following: I can do everything when the message is not
locked or is locked by myself (my thread).
remove(String key); only removes a message when it is not locked or locked by
myself.
1. Shouldn't it throw an exception, when it couldn't obtain a lock?
store(Mail m
14 matches
Mail list logo
