Right .. i missunderstood you. I thought your key = messagekey . Cause
at the moment i use key as messagekey in the help of RemoteManager ;-)
And yes the parsing of the Messagedata is exact what i have done here so
far. Will post my work later or tomorrow. Not sure yet cause i want to
write some j
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-442?page=all ]
Bernd Fondermann updated JAMES-442:
---
Attachment: postage1.2.zip
- actually write the error file
- add running environment spec to config file and write out to result files
- replaced ristretto
On 6/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a bit primative, albeit not dissimilar from MQSeries. We can
improve upon it, e.g., by looking up queue managers -- implementation and
all -- from JNDI as shown, but I am trying to not assume that every
implementation will have JNDI
Norman Maurer wrote:
> > Noel J. Bergman:
> > REMOVESPOOL =''
> i whould prefer touse "key" or to use a "regex".
> IMO both make no sense at the same time.
As far as I can see, I didn't change your syntax. You had subject=, and I
just generalized that as , since it could be subject, sender,
Sure .. It will be for all spooling commands. Anyway i whould prefer to
use "key" or to use a "regex". IMO both make no sense at the same time.
If i have time to complete it i will post it to jira and we all can have
a look again. I think changing the syntax in not so hard if it works ;-)
bye
No
Without commenting (pro or con, because I haven't had time to think about
it) on the syntax:
REMOVESPOOL =''
I will suggest that a LISTSPOOL or equivalent is vital, so that the admin
can see what would be removed before actually doing it. :-)
--- Noel
--
Not yet.. But it will be something like you descripted.. i think i will
only support regex. So it will look maybe like:
REMOVESPOOL db://maildb/spool subject='^Viagra.*blahBlah$'
REMOVESPOOL db://maildb/spool sender='[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
etc.
bye
Norman
Am Dienstag, den 13.06.2006, 12:39 +
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-530?page=comments#action_12416008 ]
Bernd Fondermann commented on JAMES-530:
just curious, do you have any ideas how the command syntax could be?
seems like these commands would be more complex than curren
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Steve Brewin wrote:
I think there is a lot of merit in coming up with a new queueing mechanism
Exactly. I really like the general direction of this proposal which is
to reuse queuing related patterns within James.
we should explain the benefits any proposed ch
Hi Norman!
Norman Maurer schrieb:
Nice to see you work hard on this. I not had time to have a closer look
at your last versions yet :-( To many work at the moment. But i will
definitly do it.. Just want you know that someone is intressted ;-)
Thank you very much! I'll be really happy if some
Nice to see you work hard on this. I not had time to have a closer look
at your last versions yet :-( To many work at the moment. But i will
definitly do it.. Just want you know that someone is intressted ;-)
bye
Norman
Am Montag, den 12.06.2006, 23:23 + schrieb Joachim Draeger (JIRA):
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
