Author: niklas
Date: Mon Aug 28 22:11:01 2006
New Revision: 437969
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437969&view=rev
Log:
Changed some log statements on ERROR level to WARN level.
Modified:
james/mime4j/branches/maven2-port/src/main/java/org/mime4j/decoder/Base64InputStream.java
jam
> I have been able to reproduce OOM exceptions today, but nothing helpful in
> the heap dumps
> It also appears that it might work better if I increase the maximum heap
> size when using hprof
Without hprof, and with Connector/J v3, JAMES v2.3RC2 has been running quite
nicely since last night, wi
Author: niklas
Date: Mon Aug 28 21:51:35 2006
New Revision: 437965
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437965&view=rev
Log:
Changed ViewCVS URL to the new format.
Modified:
james/mime4j/branches/maven2-port/pom.xml
Modified: james/mime4j/branches/maven2-port/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-599?page=comments#action_12431115 ]
Noel J. Bergman commented on JAMES-599:
---
Actually, we already have an unpublished contribution for a BSF Matcher and
Mailet. Please see:
http://mail-archi
BeanShell Scripting in James
Key: JAMES-599
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-599
Project: James
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Mailet Contributions, Matchers/Mailets (bundled)
> +
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/james/mime4j/trunk/?root=Apache-SVN
The URL should be http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/mime4j/trunk/. We changed
the format a while ago, although we'll accept the old format.
--- Noel
--
Not quite ...
> if (targetString.startsWith("error:")) {
>// No valid mapping
>return;
If there is an error: it means just that. There IS a mapping, and it says that
this is NOT a valid address. Do not pass go, do not collect $200, do not allow
the RCPT because it is allowed in some f
One of the things I'd like for us to do is change the SMTP handler to allow
specifying the entry point for injecting messages into the pipeline, rather
than the hardcoded "root", and likewise for FetchMail. So messages coming
from FetchMail might enter the pipeline in a different processor, and go
Norman Maurer wrote:
> Cause we still would need the mailet stuff anyway if we
> want to use fetchpop.
Not necessarily. See my message about "Processor Flexibility Enhancements".
> > Regardless, we still need to make sure that we don't assume that
> > something like:
> > error:550 Requested a
Author: niklas
Date: Mon Aug 28 12:30:15 2006
New Revision: 437794
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437794&view=rev
Log:
Commented out some samples which doesn't exist yet.
Changed the build instructions to use Maven 2.0.
Modified:
james/mime4j/branches/maven2-port/src/site/xdoc/samples.
Author: niklas
Date: Mon Aug 28 12:17:01 2006
New Revision: 437788
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437788&view=rev
Log:
Fixed an error in the scm URLs (mime4k instead of mime4j).
Changed the version to 0.3-SNAPSHOT (was 0.4-SNAPSHOT).
Added compiler plugin configuration to set the encoding o
Author: norman
Date: Mon Aug 28 11:24:41 2006
New Revision: 437772
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437772&view=rev
Log:
First setp for Virtual user handlers. See JAMES-597
Added:
james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/core/filter/fastfail/AbstractVirtualUserTableHandle
Am Montag, den 28.08.2006, 13:40 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
> > I don't think that its a good idea to do the mapping in fastfail. I
> > think the best way at the moment whould be to check for valid mappings
> > only.
>
> Why?
>
Cause we still whould need the mailet stuff anyway if we want to
> I don't think that its a good idea to do the mapping in fastfail. I
> think the best way at the moment whould be to check for valid mappings
> only.
Why?
Regardless, we still need to make sure that we don't assume that something
like:
error:550 Requested action not taken: no such user here
I don't think that its a good idea to do the mapping in fastfail. I
think the best way at the moment whould be to check for valid mappings
only.
bye
Norman
Am Montag, den 28.08.2006, 05:53 -0700 schrieb Noel J. Bergman (JIRA):
> [
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-597?page=commen
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-597?page=comments#action_12430969 ]
Noel J. Bergman commented on JAMES-597:
---
Some caveats:
1) We want to support multiple virtual user table implementations, as we do
with the mailets. Two o
+1
thanks Stefano for doing this simplification
Bernd
On 8/27/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bernd,
I think that this change is safe as James Server already have a default
hardcoded configuration for the smtp handlerchain but I don't know the
postage code too much and I wo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-590?page=all ]
Norman Maurer resolved JAMES-590.
-
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Add commands to RemoteManager to corpusfeed JDBCBayesianAnalyzer
> --
Add commands to RemoteManager to export BayesianAnalyzer data
--
Key: JAMES-598
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-598
Project: James
Issue Type: New Feature
Add rcpthandler to map virtual users before call ValidRcptHandler
-
Key: JAMES-597
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-597
Project: James
Issue Type: Sub-task
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-597?page=all ]
Norman Maurer reassigned JAMES-597:
---
Assignee: Norman Maurer
> Add rcpthandler to map virtual users before call ValidRcptHandler
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-510?page=all ]
Norman Maurer reopened JAMES-510:
-
Norman Maurer wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> private void checkValidRcpt(SMTPSession session) {
>>>MailAddress rcpt =
session.getState().ge
Am Sonntag, den 27.08.2006, 22:45 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
> Norman Maurer wrote:
> > Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> >>> private void checkValidRcpt(SMTPSession session) {
> >>>MailAddress rcpt =
> session.getState().getSMTPSession.CURRENT_RECIPIENT);
> >>>boolean invalidUser = true;
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
