[jira] Commented: (JAMES-709) [PATCH] Log IO issues to help diagnosis

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-709?page=comments#action_12454451 ] Robert Burrell Donkin commented on JAMES-709: - it looks ok but it's hard for me to test this code: my local version has drifted away from James. I def

[jira] Resolved: (JAMES-716) Add support for VirtualHosting

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-716?page=all ] Norman Maurer resolved JAMES-716. - Resolution: Fixed > Add support for VirtualHosting > -- > > Key: JAMES-716 > URL: http://issues.apa

[jira] Created: (JAMES-719) Using of defaultdomain is inconsistent

Using of defaultdomain is inconsistent -- Key: JAMES-719 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-719 Project: James Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Norman Maurer Priority: Minor

svn commit: r480586 - in /james/server/trunk/src: conf/ java/org/apache/james/ java/org/apache/james/services/ java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/core/filter/ java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/ te

Author: norman Date: Wed Nov 29 06:49:51 2006 New Revision: 480586 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=480586 Log: Allow to specify a defaultDomain which get added to a recipient if no localpart is given Correct the classes to use the right defaultDomain Modified: james/server/tru

[jira] Resolved: (JAMES-657) fetchmail cannot complete processing, because of problem with dnsjava and firewall/dns

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-657?page=all ] Joerg Buchberger resolved JAMES-657. Fix Version/s: Trunk Resolution: Fixed apparently fixed in Revisions 471758 and 472716 > fetchmail cannot complete processing, because of problem

svn commit: r480543 - in /james/server/trunk/src: conf/ java/org/apache/james/ java/org/apache/james/remotemanager/ java/org/apache/james/services/ java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/ test/org/ap

Author: norman Date: Wed Nov 29 03:54:46 2006 New Revision: 480543 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=480543 Log: Add support for virtualhosting. See JAMES-716 Modified: james/server/trunk/src/conf/james-config.xml james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/James.java j

Re: RemoteManagerTest fails

Ok, i think the failing RemoteManagerTest is now fixed. bye Norman Norman Maurer schrieb: > I will try to take care.. > > bye > Norman > > Noel J. Bergman schrieb: > >>> Can you check if it only happen randomly ? >>> >>> >> I would use the term "sporadic", but yes it appears to be

svn commit: r480519 - in /james/server/trunk/src: java/org/apache/james/remotemanager/RemoteManagerHandler.java test/org/apache/james/remotemanager/RemoteManagerTest.java

Author: norman Date: Wed Nov 29 03:12:57 2006 New Revision: 480519 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=480519 Log: Remote duplicated line in help output. Set back the delay time to 100ms in RemoteManagerTest Modified: james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/remotemanager/Re

svn commit: r480516 - /james/server/trunk/src/test/org/apache/james/remotemanager/RemoteManagerTest.java

Author: norman Date: Wed Nov 29 02:49:56 2006 New Revision: 480516 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=480516 Log: We have to read the exact amount of lines to get sure the output has completly readed. Attemp to fix sporadic failing test Modified: james/server/trunk/src/test/org/

svn commit: r480500 - /james/server/trunk/src/test/org/apache/james/remotemanager/RemoteManagerTest.java

Author: norman Date: Wed Nov 29 01:50:07 2006 New Revision: 480500 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=480500 Log: Try to fix sporadic failing test Modified: james/server/trunk/src/test/org/apache/james/remotemanager/RemoteManagerTest.java Modified: james/server/trunk/src/test/o

Re: [DISCUSSION] Preparing next-major

On 11/29/06, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Bernd, sure i took care of all concerns if i hadn't i whould upload it :-P About the coding style.. You know coding style differ from commiter to commiter. But if thats all you are not happy with then im happy . If you don't agree with

Re: [DISCUSSION] Preparing next-major

Hi Bernd, sure i took care of all concerns if i hadn't i whould upload it :-P About the coding style.. You know coding style differ from commiter to commiter. But if thats all you are not happy with then im happy . And yes user/account handling is really in need of great refactoring. But i asspe

Re: [DISCUSSION] Preparing next-major

Hi Norman, CTR would suggest yes. +1, this stuff probably does what it says it does, so if you took care of all others concerns (if any), please commit. I have only my usual boring micro-complaints about coding style (for example if(xx == false) => if (!xx)) which does not justify to hold you b

Re: [DISCUSSION] Preparing next-major

I whould also like to see my virtualHosting patch in next-major: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-716 But no comments yet .. Does this mean i should commit it ? bye Norman Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini schrieb: > It seems to be a reasonable set of choices. > > I will try to have james-616

Re: RemoteManagerTest fails

I will try to take care.. bye Norman Noel J. Bergman schrieb: >> Can you check if it only happen randomly ? >> > > I would use the term "sporadic", but yes it appears to be sporadic. > Frequent enough, though, that we've not had nightly builds posted > consistently, since we won't post a bui

JAMES Server Nightly Build Report

Updating From Source Control At revision 480473. Do a Clean Build with Unit Tests and Distri