On 12/29/06, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
IANAL but i'll try to help...
AIUI intellectual property is a loose term grouping several distinct
areas of law:
* trademarks
* trade secrets
* patents
* copyright
unless you hold patents, are party to
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 12/29/06, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that for DK we have to deal with their patent and the license
for Implementing the Specification.
[...]
IANAL...
Nor do I, and if I understand ASF rules we cannot decide ourselves this
issue. There is
Author: bago
Date: Sat Dec 30 06:36:49 2006
New Revision: 491228
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=491228
Log:
Renamed CommandsHandler to HandlersPackage (I think CommandsHandler was too
similar to CommandHandler and we now use it to return also different Handlers
and not only
On 12/30/06, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 12/29/06, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that for DK we have to deal with their patent and the license
for Implementing the Specification.
[...]
IANAL...
Nor do I, and if I understand
robert burrell donkin wrote:
I don't like too much the use of svn:externals. Either way we'll have to
wait for the legal issues to be resolved in order to try to release.
sorry for not explaining fully: i meant to suggest starting a project
which imported the last james release and added the
Author: norman
Date: Sat Dec 30 07:34:06 2006
New Revision: 491237
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=491237
Log:
Modify fastfail handlers to use new Hooks. See JAMES-750 and JAMES-549
Modified:
Author: bago
Date: Sat Dec 30 08:11:26 2006
New Revision: 491246
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=491246
Log:
Changed MessageHandler to MessageHook: now all messageHandlers don't use
SMTPcodes, but HookResults like other extension points.
Added:
On 12/30/06, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
I don't like too much the use of svn:externals. Either way we'll have to
wait for the legal issues to be resolved in order to try to release.
sorry for not explaining fully: i meant to suggest starting a
Hi List,
since a week or so, I am trying to solve a seemingly simple problem:
Given a database entry that contains an email as Text, find the body
of the message. This boils down to:
Given the String representation of the message, find the human-written
part of the content.
I'm not interested
Some of this conversation is difficult to follow as I don't know who's
who. However, it seems that the current consensus is to attach the
current source it as a JIRA issue and go from there... Is a CLA
required for to submit the issue, or does that only become necessary
when it's time to commit
On 12/30/06, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of this conversation is difficult to follow as I don't know who's
who. However, it seems that the current consensus is to attach the
current source it as a JIRA issue and go from there...
+1
Is a CLA required for to submit the issue, or
Author: norman
Date: Sat Dec 30 10:26:15 2006
New Revision: 491270
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=491270
Log:
Change MessageHook implementation to return HookReturnCode.DECLINED insteed of
null. Null was workin but DECLINED is more correct.
Modified:
DomainKeys mailet for JAMES
---
Key: JAMES-752
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-752
Project: James
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Mailet Contributions
Reporter: Tom Brown
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-752?page=all ]
Tom Brown updated JAMES-752:
Attachment: domainkeys-src.zip
This is the java src directory containing the implementation of domain keys.
DomainKeys mailet for JAMES
---
On 12/30/06, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have submitted the code via JIRA. I believe it's issue #12359570.
good (the url is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-752)
if domain keys are being presented to the IEFT for standardization,
it'd be a good idea for some people to show
On 12/19/06, Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry I don't know which defect you are talking about.
The memory leak is the main thing, plus I wanted to backport the per-IP
connection code. I have already done that privately, and have been running
with those changes since the day I
Author: bago
Date: Sat Dec 30 18:51:49 2006
New Revision: 491368
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=491368
Log:
Changed DataCmdHandler to be push based.
Added a TODO file for in-progress stuff.
Added:
james/server/sandbox/handlerapi-experiment/TODO
17 matches
Mail list logo
