[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
> Author: norman
> Date: Mon Sep 10 22:47:53 2007
> New Revision: 574466
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=574466&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove empty packages ( Stefano seems to miss this..)
>
> Removed:
> james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/m
Author: norman
Date: Tue Sep 11 02:27:37 2007
New Revision: 574526
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=574526&view=rev
Log:
Remove empty package
Removed:
james/jspf/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/james/jspf/macro/
-
To un
Author: norman
Date: Tue Sep 11 02:33:17 2007
New Revision: 574529
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=574529&view=rev
Log:
Correct visibility ( missed this before)
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/SPF.java
Modified: james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apac
Sorry for the offtopic post, but figured this group might have an
answer to this as much as any.
I was recently told by someone who said they had built all their DNS
scripts around the notion that CNAMEs are deprecated. We would be
hosting a service offsite that would be a hostname/subdomain of t
Hi Serge,
I worked for an ISP till some month ago and I never heared about that...
I think the only problems with CNAME's are that it took more lookups to
get the final informations, so your DNS will get more stressed and the
"clients" maybe notice slower "resultion" times..
bye
Norman
Serge
Serge Knystautas ha scritto:
> Sorry for the offtopic post, but figured this group might have an
> answer to this as much as any.
>
> I was recently told by someone who said they had built all their DNS
> scripts around the notion that CNAMEs are deprecated. We would be
> hosting a service offsit
