Hi,
Further to my request for help concerning removing spam mail after 15 days:
In my james config.xml I have:
8640
In my CleanMailRepoService code I have: (taken from FetchScheduler)
Configuration[] confs = conf.getChildren( "cleanup" );
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On 9/30/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The case I was referring to is different because that poms have not been
>> submitted to JIRA but have been created by someone else that never
>> donated/submitted them for JAMES inclusion. (like any JAR w
Am Sonntag, den 30.09.2007, 16:28 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> > sample of failure:
> >
> > [javac]
> > /srv/gump/public/workspace/james-server/smtpserver-function/src/main/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/core/filter/fastfail/SPFHandler.java:30:
> > pack
On 9/30/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> > On 9/30/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm a bit confused because in 3 years I spent around ASF projects I
> >> never seen anyone in ASF using a similar sentence when committing third
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On 9/30/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm a bit confused because in 3 years I spent around ASF projects I
>> never seen anyone in ASF using a similar sentence when committing third
>> party jars or resources to svn. Have we all did it wrong in
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> sample of failure:
>
> [javac]
> /srv/gump/public/workspace/james-server/smtpserver-function/src/main/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/core/filter/fastfail/SPFHandler.java:30:
> package org.apache.james.jspf.impl does not exist
>
> do we need to tell gump abo
On 9/30/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> > hey stefano!
> >
> > are the pom's in stage covered by a CLA?
>
> I'm not familiar with the "covered by a CLA" you already asked me in past.
>
> That poms are not an original contribution by me.
ok (didn
Author: bago
Date: Sun Sep 30 07:17:34 2007
New Revision: 580728
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=580728&view=rev
Log:
Fix for broken nightly builds.
m2 updates for jspf to apache-jspf artifact name changes and unused dependency
exclusions.
Added:
james/server/trunk/stage/org.apache.jam
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> hey stefano!
>
> are the pom's in stage covered by a CLA?
I'm not familiar with the "covered by a CLA" you already asked me in past.
That poms are not an original contribution by me. So I just read the
icla again and I think this what you refer to:
---
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project james-server has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Sep 30 02:36:48 2007
New Revision: 580688
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=580688&view=rev
Log:
Added missing license header
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/src/test/resources/log4j.properties
Modified: james/jsieve/trunk/src/test/resources/log4j.properties
URL:
hey stefano!
are the pom's in stage covered by a CLA?
in other words, is it safe for me to attach the standard license headers
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
Updating From Source Control
At revision 580680.
Do a Clean Build with Unit Tests and Distri
13 matches
Mail list logo
