Re: Multiple matchers per mailet ?

2007-11-23 Thread Danny Angus
On 22/11/2007, Tim Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do you have any comments / advice on if this is a good idea or would > be of any interest within James 3 (or whatever it will be known as)? > if i do go ahead it will only be the mailet container not the > fetchmail, smtp (or other) servic

Re: Multiple matchers per mailet ?

2007-11-23 Thread Tim Stephenson
Thanks for so many quick replies. I will take a look at JSieve though since I know Rhino I must confess that sounds quite attractive. >From your comments I gathered a next generation API might on the cards and also that a change to support multiple matchers (other than a JSieve / Rhino option) mig