On 22/11/2007, Tim Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do you have any comments / advice on if this is a good idea or would
> be of any interest within James 3 (or whatever it will be known as)?
> if i do go ahead it will only be the mailet container not the
> fetchmail, smtp (or other) servic
Thanks for so many quick replies. I will take a look at JSieve though
since I know Rhino I must confess that sounds quite attractive.
>From your comments I gathered a next generation API might on the cards
and also that a change to support multiple matchers (other than a
JSieve / Rhino option) mig