Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Feb 3 15:26:24 2008
New Revision: 618121
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618121&view=rev
Log:
Straight copy of james-jcr into trunk. No build integration yet and possibly
some discussion needed. Any revisions after 618120 will need to be merged in
later.
Added:
Author: berndf
Date: Sun Feb 3 15:14:25 2008
New Revision: 618118
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618118&view=rev
Log:
web container deployment, first take. see JAMES-834
Added:
james/server/trunk/spring-deployment/src/main/config/warfile/
james/server/trunk/spring-deployment/src/m
Webcontainer Deployment (WAR)
-
Key: JAMES-834
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-834
Project: James
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Deployment Modules
Reporter: Bernd Fonde
On Feb 3, 2008 9:51 AM, Bernd Fondermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do others think?
Long overdue.
My opinion in the past was that James should be deployable in a J2EE
container but I always envisaged that as EJB's and JCA in an EAR
rather than at the WAR level. But if you can do it then g
On Feb 3, 2008 8:30 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> Spring-osgi (opposed to Spring in a web-container) is not yet ready to
> deal with custom ApplicationContexts (yet). This results in the fact I
> see no easy way currently to boot our components.
>
>
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Hi,
with the release of the OSGi extension to Spring[1], it seems to be
reasonably easy to turn any spring app into an OSGi deployment ('bundle').
I'd like to try and make the spring deployment OSGi-deployable this way.
In a first step, this would only mean 'deployabl
On Feb 3, 2008 5:50 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> >> I run a few grep to see what modules/code import each class/package in
> >> core-library and here are some considerations:
> >>
> >> org.apache.james.security.*
> >> - they are only used by s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03 February 2008 00:09:
> [X] +1 I agree that Jukka should be allowed to commit
> anywhere in James codebase
Go!
Cheers
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
I run a few grep to see what modules/code import each class/package in
core-library and here are some considerations:
org.apache.james.security.*
- they are only used by spoolmanager-function, and only by smime mailets
(org.apache.james.transport.mailets.smime.*
Author: bago
Date: Sun Feb 3 09:44:17 2008
New Revision: 618042
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618042&view=rev
Log:
Move org.apache.james.context to phoenix-deployment module.
Removed:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/context/
--
Author: bago
Date: Sun Feb 3 09:42:48 2008
New Revision: 618041
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618041&view=rev
Log:
Move org.apache.james.context to phoenix-deployment module.
Added:
james/server/trunk/phoenix-deployment/src/java/org/apache/james/context/
- copied from r611831,
Author: bago
Date: Sun Feb 3 09:41:31 2008
New Revision: 618040
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618040&view=rev
Log:
Remove unused class
Removed:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/util/Assert.java
-
Author: bago
Date: Sun Feb 3 09:31:41 2008
New Revision: 618038
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618038&view=rev
Log:
Move urirbl util package to smtpserver-function.
Removed:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/util/urirbl/
-
Author: bago
Date: Sun Feb 3 09:31:26 2008
New Revision: 618037
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618037&view=rev
Log:
Move urirbl util package to smtpserver-function.
Added:
james/server/trunk/smtpserver-function/src/main/java/org/apache/james/util/urirbl/
- copied from r611831,
Author: bago
Date: Sun Feb 3 09:30:24 2008
New Revision: 618036
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618036&view=rev
Log:
Move MatcherInverter to the util.mailet package
Added:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/util/mailet/MatcherInverter.java
- copied, c
Author: bago
Date: Sun Feb 3 09:23:10 2008
New Revision: 618031
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618031&view=rev
Log:
Move junkscore util package to smtpserver-function.
Removed:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/util/junkscore/
--
Author: bago
Date: Sun Feb 3 09:22:48 2008
New Revision: 618030
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618030&view=rev
Log:
Move junkscore util package to smtpserver-function.
Added:
james/server/trunk/smtpserver-function/src/main/java/org/apache/james/util/
james/server/trunk/smtpserver
Author: bago
Date: Sun Feb 3 09:19:25 2008
New Revision: 618029
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618029&view=rev
Log:
Remove empty folders/packages
Removed:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/fetchmail/
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/ap
Author: bago
Date: Sun Feb 3 09:17:44 2008
New Revision: 618027
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618027&view=rev
Log:
- Added some serialversionUid
- Removed some unused imports
- Remove mime4j version from pom.xml because we use dependencyManagement in
parent pom.
Modified:
james/ser
[X] +1 I agree that Jukka should be allowed to commit anywhere in James codebase
Vincenzo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Feb 2, 2008 6:39 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Our torque function also depends on avalon services.
not since i stripped out the dependency ;-)
the avalon-based configuration is in pheonix but the module has been
clean for a few months
T
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Feb 3 04:34:08 2008
New Revision: 617980
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=617980&view=rev
Log:
IMAP processor now uses Mime4j.
Modified:
james/server/trunk/imap-mailbox-processor-function/pom.xml
Modified: james/server/trunk/imap-mailbox-processor-function/pom
Danny Angus ha scritto:
If you agree that Jukka's limited agreement to commit only to the
sandbox be lifted and it be understood that Jukka is now trusted to
commit wherever he feels appropriate please vote accordingly..
[X] +1 I agree that Jukka should be allowed to commit anywhere in James
c
On Feb 3, 2008 9:51 AM, Bernd Fondermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Triggered by recent posts by Jukka and others, I am starting to work
> on a spring-deployment based web archive (WAR) deployment.
> Deploying James in Tomcat or Jetty might look odd to some. And it
> really in a way is si
Author: berndf
Date: Sun Feb 3 02:05:20 2008
New Revision: 617970
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=617970&view=rev
Log:
spring-deployment: prepare adding config files for WAR and OSGi deployments
Added:
james/server/trunk/spring-deployment/src/main/config/james/
james/server/trunk/
Hi,
Triggered by recent posts by Jukka and others, I am starting to work
on a spring-deployment based web archive (WAR) deployment.
Deploying James in Tomcat or Jetty might look odd to some. And it
really in a way is since there is no HTTP based functionality in
James.
But this deployment would m
On Feb 3, 2008 8:20 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah. In the sandbox i did this using JMS lookup for services,
>
> JMS ->JNDI ...?
Doh! Yeah, slip of the brain. At my age all acronyms start to merge into one ;-)
d.
--
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
On Feb 3, 2008 12:03 AM, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did the "v3" stuff and the sandbox stuff isn't very different, look
> at it, I can do it all again.
> The problems are really only...
>
> 1/ some of the interfaces that you need to move to mailet aren't
> totally normalised, IOW th
On Feb 2, 2008 3:57 PM, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2008 12:57 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i agree in principle but trunk has a lot of JAMES-specific mailets
> > (but i suspect that many of these could be decoupled)
>
> Very many of them can.
>
On Feb 3, 2008 12:09 AM, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X] +1 I agree that Jukka should be allowed to commit anywhere in James
> codebase
> [ ] 0 I will abide by the majority decision
> [ ] -1 I disagree, the PMC should debate this case further.
- robert
-
31 matches
Mail list logo
