Author: rdonkin
Date: Sat Feb 23 10:00:35 2008
New Revision: 630484
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=630484&view=rev
Log:
Added tests for FETCH HEADER.FIELDS and fixed bug.
Added:
james/server/trunk/experimental-seda-imap-function/src/test/java/org/apache/james/test/functional/imap/Abst
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Serhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a java developer and having a big interest to the creating free and
> powerfull mailing platform I decided to join Apache james project.
Great!
> But
> from the very beginning I am starting to have some doubts
Author: norman
Date: Sat Feb 23 07:49:17 2008
New Revision: 630455
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=630455&view=rev
Log:
Fix format ( eclipse drives me crazy )
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/core/SPFSession.java
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/o
Author: norman
Date: Sat Feb 23 07:47:23 2008
New Revision: 630454
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=630454&view=rev
Log:
Finally fix JSPF-60 ( all tests pass again )
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/core/SPFSession.java
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/
Hi,
I have started to fix this stuff.. I need to recheck the tests because
some fails now so if you want jump in.
Bye
Norman
Am Samstag, den 23.02.2008, 15:36 + schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Author: norman
> Date: Sat Feb 23 07:36:57 2008
> New Revision: 630452
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org
Author: norman
Date: Sat Feb 23 07:36:57 2008
New Revision: 630452
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=630452&view=rev
Log:
Next try to fix JSPF-60
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/core/SPFSession.java
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james
Am Samstag, den 23.02.2008, 15:22 +0100 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Norman Maurer ha scritto:
> > Hi Stefano,
> >
> > after rereading I think you are right... What you think we should do ?
> > Just throw the exceptions ( NoneException, PermErrorException ) on
> > checkSPF method ?
>
> We probably
Norman Maurer ha scritto:
Hi Stefano,
after rereading I think you are right... What you think we should do ?
Just throw the exceptions ( NoneException, PermErrorException ) on
checkSPF method ?
We probably have to change SPFSession so that it doesn't throw an
exception on constructor but inst
Hello,
I am a java developer and having a big interest to the creating free and
powerfull mailing platform I decided to join Apache james project. But
from the very beginning I am starting to have some doubts. Mainly this
is related to the usage of Apache Avalon framework. Their official site
say
Hi Stefano,
after rereading I think you are right... What you think we should do ?
Just throw the exceptions ( NoneException, PermErrorException ) on
checkSPF method ?
bye
Norman
Am Samstag, den 23.02.2008, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Norman Maurer ha scritto:
> > Hi Stefano,
> >
>
Norman Maurer ha scritto:
Hi Stefano,
by my understanding the mailserver should take care about valid format
of the given data. So I think throwing the IllegalArgumentException is
the best we can do.
I don't think so. We should do what the SPF RFC tell us to do.
Furthermore we currently throw
Hi Stefano,
by my understanding the mailserver should take care about valid format
of the given data. So I think throwing the IllegalArgumentException is
the best we can do.
bye
Norman
Am Samstag, den 23.02.2008, 13:55 +0100 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Norman Maurer ha scritto:
> > What you guy t
Norman Maurer ha scritto:
What you guy think should we maybe use a checked exception ?
As far as I can tell the SPF check MUST return one of the return codes
defined by the RFC, so PermErrorException or NoneException seems to be
the best answer.. but I have to reread the SPF RFC to see if the
it may well be better to add this to postage (possibly as a separate
project) rather than create a new sub-project: postage is the natural
place to look for an email functional testing framework.
I'm all for this.
I just observed a "reusability" potential.
However, my experience with postage is
Norman Maurer wrote:
What you guy think should we maybe use a checked exception ?
Unchecked is fine for me in this case.
Bernd
Cheers
Norman
Am Freitag, den 22.02.2008, 14:17 + schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: norman
Date: Fri Feb 22 06:17:19 2008
New Revision: 630214
URL: http:/
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Bernd Fondermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2008 8:07 PM, Ahmed Mohombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It looks like the test framework for JAMES (at least for IMAP),
> > is pretty independent of JAMES (or at least a part of it),
> > an
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sat Feb 23 01:59:46 2008
New Revision: 630419
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=630419&view=rev
Log:
FETCH HEADER.FIELDS test script.
Added:
james/server/trunk/experimental-seda-imap-function/src/test/resources/org/apache/james/test/functional/imap/scripts/FetchHead
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
18 matches
Mail list logo
