On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the IMAP session might reasonably maintain a list of RECENT mail but
> SEARCH requires RECENT and is implemented in the mailbox layer to
> allow optimisation. so SearchQuery would need to allow a list of
> RECEN
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Bernd Fondermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because of my lack of IMAP knowledge, I don't get all the subtilities
> of the protocol.
IMO subtilities->stupidities ;-)
> However.
>
> Regarding the RECENT flag the RFC authors seems to say: 'Heck, I don't
>
>
>
> [x] +1 Create product standard-mailets in mailet subproject
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 Do not create product standard-mailets in mailet subproject
>
> -
>
>
> --8<--
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the recent response is a PITA when using a database backend.
> the
> specification is (as is expected with IMAP) not unequivocal:
>
>
> 7.3.2. RECENT Response
>
> Contents: none
>
> The RECENT response repo
(for those that don't read http://www.planetapache.org) see
http://www.jroller.com/robertburrelldonkin/entry/mail2_0_booting_rmep
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
