JAMES Server Nightly Build Report

2008-05-02 Thread JAMES Nightly Build System
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/ Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below: -

Re: compile 2.3.1

2008-05-02 Thread Serge Knystautas
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: > > > > Probably, with the newest versions of Java. Mordred is deprecated, and > > > since I don't see any reason to update mordred, it will be removed as > soon

Re: Extract Modred Library [WAS Re: compile 2.3.1]

2008-05-02 Thread Serge Knystautas
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > > > Noel advocated deletion in another thread > > After some years of resisting removing it. :-) > > > > I tend to be conservative about backwards compatibility. So I would > > tend to

RE: compile 2.3.1

2008-05-02 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Serge Knystautas wrote: > This is a good example of Robert's points on modularity. If mordred > was a separate project built separately, we could keep it as a binary > dependency, no? Except that the issue is that mordred needs updating because it no longer works with newer versions of Java.

re: Milestone from trunk

2008-05-02 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > there is no prospect of releasing trunk without Noel's active support. I hope that's not actually the case, but regardless, what does the PMC think of the following? Trunk is simply not trustworthy. Anyone who would consider releasing from trunk would do little to

Re: Milestone from trunk

2008-05-02 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > > > there is no prospect of releasing trunk without Noel's active support. > > I hope that's not actually the case, but regardless, what does the PMC think > of the following? > > Trunk i

RE: Milestone from trunk

2008-05-02 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Bernd Fondermann wrote: > I don't trust 2.3.1 more than TRUNK or any other James snapshot. That's really too bad, since we know from empirical experience that JAMES 2.3 + my patches hold up to years of real-world production loads. We have some justification that 2.3.x are OK because we're not ge

Re: Milestone from trunk

2008-05-02 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: That sort of thinking led Stefano to push to rush out v2.3.0 over my objections that there was a critical memory leak. LOL very funny :-) Stefano - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For ad