JAMES Server Nightly Build Report

An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/ Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:

[postage] refresh

Hi all, I checked out postage to revamp the build and make sure it is self contained and build like every other product we have in the repository. I locally updated both the ant and the m2 descriptors and updated the code to build against server trunk (of course this only changes how

Re: Writing Installer for James

I checked httpd people to understand how they do this. The fact is that what they care is about sources: they release sources. The installer they ship is simply something they do unrelated to the release and is done by some committer having windows and a license for the tool. In this case

[jira] Assigned: (MIME4J-51) Remove cyclic dependencies and provide better organization of the source tree.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-51?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefano Bagnara reassigned MIME4J-51: - Assignee: Stefano Bagnara Remove cyclic dependencies and provide better organization of

svn commit: r682372 [2/2] - in /james/mime4j/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/ main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/decoder/ main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/descriptor/ main/java/org/apache

Copied: james/mime4j/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/decoder/CodecUtilTest.java (from r680972, james/mime4j/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/util/CodecUtilTest.java) URL:

svn commit: r682373 - in /james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/parser: Event.java MimeEntity.java

Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 4 06:08:47 2008 New Revision: 682373 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682373view=rev Log: Added license headers: please review, they seem to be missing from the contribution MIME4J-5 Modified:

svn commit: r682374 - /james/mime4j/trunk/pom.xml

Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 4 06:12:00 2008 New Revision: 682374 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682374view=rev Log: Updated rat checks. Not sure how to better deal with license headers for the testmsgs. Modified: james/mime4j/trunk/pom.xml Modified: james/mime4j/trunk/pom.xml URL:

[jira] Commented: (MIME4J-51) Remove cyclic dependencies and provide better organization of the source tree.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-51?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12619501#action_12619501 ] Stefano Bagnara commented on MIME4J-51: --- Applied the proposed repackaging. Please

Re: [Mime4j] Benchmark of 0.3 vs 0.4

Hi Niklas, thank you for sharing this interesing results! What JVM (java version / platform) are you using? Stefano Niklas Therning ha scritto: Hi, I've done some benchmarking of the recent performance improvements in trunk vs Mime4j 0.3. I must say that the result is very promising! :)

svn commit: r682384 - /james/server/trunk/mailbox-library/src/test/java/org/apache/james/mailboxmanager/util/MailboxEventAnalyserTest.java

Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 4 06:37:05 2008 New Revision: 682384 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682384view=rev Log: Remove garbage from imports Modified: james/server/trunk/mailbox-library/src/test/java/org/apache/james/mailboxmanager/util/MailboxEventAnalyserTest.java Modified:

svn commit: r682387 - /james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/security/

Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 4 06:39:09 2008 New Revision: 682387 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682387view=rev Log: Remove empty package Removed: james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/security/

svn commit: r682394 - /james/server/trunk/stage/pom.xml

Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 4 07:13:57 2008 New Revision: 682394 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682394view=rev Log: Make sure stage install the dependencies during the compilation phase. Modified: james/server/trunk/stage/pom.xml Modified: james/server/trunk/stage/pom.xml URL:

Re: [Mime4j] Benchmark of 0.3 vs 0.4

I'm using Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit on a 2.4 GHz core duo Dell laptop. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a Linux niklas-laptop 2.6.24-19-generic #1 SMP Fri Jul 11 21:01:46 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ java -version java version 1.6.0_06 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_06-b02)

svn commit: r682405 - /james/jspf/trunk/test

Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 4 07:37:04 2008 New Revision: 682405 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682405view=rev Log: Remove files without license header (make the m2 install fail because of rat checks) Removed: james/jspf/trunk/test

svn commit: r682416 - in /james/mailet: base/trunk/build.xml base/trunk/include.properties base/trunk/stage/org.apache.james/jars/mailet-2.4-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar crypto/trunk/build.xml standard/trunk/bu

Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 4 08:01:46 2008 New Revision: 682416 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682416view=rev Log: Updated the ant build to support new tests moved from server's code (according to MAILET-13) Added:

Re: [mailets] moving tests for standard mailets from phoenix-deployment

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HI all, I'd like to move all of the tests we have in phoenix-deployment to the appropriate places. sounds great :-) [...] Should I commit this stuff only after updating also the ant

Re: phoenix-deployment tests status

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 8/1/08, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I've moved most tests from the phoenix-deployment module to the module of the class they was testing. The only remaining tests are the imap tests. THe issue with imap tests is that they depends both

svn commit: r682435 - in /james/mailet: base/trunk/ base/trunk/stage/junit/ base/trunk/stage/junit/jars/ base/trunk/stage/junit/poms/ crypto/trunk/ crypto/trunk/stage/junit/ crypto/trunk/stage/junit/j

Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 4 09:10:16 2008 New Revision: 682435 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682435view=rev Log: Applying the alternative way to bind junit to base/standard/crypto as it seems it worked on api. Added: james/mailet/base/trunk/stage/junit/

Re: JAMES Projects on Hudson

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 7/28/08, Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Sonntag, den 27.07.2008, 22:20 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Is there any mailing list

Re: JAMES Projects on Hudson

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 7/28/08, Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Sonntag, den

Re: JAMES Projects on Hudson

Am Montag, den 04.08.2008, 18:13 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 7/28/08, Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Sonntag, den 27.07.2008, 22:20

Re: JAMES Projects on Hudson

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Montag, den 04.08.2008, 18:13 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 7/28/08,

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 7/29/08, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As you know I'm

Re: [Mime4j] Benchmark of 0.3 vs 0.4

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Niklas Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've done some benchmarking of the recent performance improvements in trunk vs Mime4j 0.3. I must say that the result is very promising! :) I did my tests on about 13 messages, most of them less than 10 kB in

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 7/29/08, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL

[mime4j] what else need to be done (Was: Benchmark of 0.3 vs 0.4)

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: what else needs to be done before we can ship? I'm looking here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel I see 4 issues open for the 0.4 release: MIME4J-57 Add a max limit to header length

Re: phoenix-deployment tests status

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 8/1/08, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I've moved most tests from the phoenix-deployment module to the module of the class they was testing. The only remaining

Re: phoenix-deployment tests status

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 8/1/08, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I've moved most tests from the phoenix-deployment module to the module of the class they

svn commit: r682446 - in /james/mailet: base/trunk/build.xml crypto/trunk/build.xml standard/trunk/build.xml

Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 4 10:29:28 2008 New Revision: 682446 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682446view=rev Log: Forgot to commit updated build.xml to reflect the fact that we have junit in the tree now. Modified: james/mailet/base/trunk/build.xml

svn commit: r682447 - in /james/mailet: base/trunk/build.xml crypto/trunk/build.xml standard/trunk/build.xml

Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 4 10:32:13 2008 New Revision: 682447 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682447view=rev Log: Forgot to commit updated build.xml to reflect the fact that we have junit in the tree now. Modified: james/mailet/base/trunk/build.xml

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 7/29/08, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin

Re: JAMES Projects on Hudson

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Montag, den 04.08.2008, 18:13 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell

Re: phoenix-deployment tests status

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip once we start releasing the mailets library, this will offer an easier way for users to start to

[PROPOSAL] remove ant and m2 offline build hacks from jSPF

As you know I'm working on a branch to make jSPF a multimodule product. It took half an hour to prepare the modules and refactor the m2 descriptor so to have 2 modules correctly managed by m2 but it already took a lot of hours trying to make it build while offline. The stage module hack is

Re: JAMES Projects on Hudson

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Montag, den 04.08.2008, 18:13 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Sun, Aug

Re: JAMES Projects on Hudson

Am Montag, den 04.08.2008, 19:35 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Montag, den 04.08.2008, 18:13 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at

Re: JAMES Projects on Hudson

Norman Maurer ha scritto: Am Montag, den 04.08.2008, 19:35 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Montag, den 04.08.2008, 18:13 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: it's better to use a PROPOSAL or a POLL and then moved gradually trying to carry the community with me (or at least as many who wanted to come along), or just invoked Rules For Revolutionaries and forked Done. Just wrote a PROPOSAL. How much should I wait

notification/commit list (was: JAMES Projects on Hudson)

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 7/28/08, Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: it's better to use a PROPOSAL or a POLL and then moved gradually trying to carry the community with me (or at least as many who wanted to come along), or just invoked Rules For

Re: notification/commit list (was: JAMES Projects on Hudson)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [server.trunk] introducing mail-library

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to create a mail-library module including everything we currently have in core-library in the o.a.j.util.mail package. They are various mdn/dsn (mail delivery notification, delivery status notification) related

Re: [server.trunk] user-api and user-library package names

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: user-api and user-library seems almost ok as modules, but I feel the packages are wrong. +1 Is this something concerning also other developers or it's me too much strict wrt packages/dependencies and this stuff? no:

Re: [server.trunk] extract handler stuff from core-module (Was: modules/package refactoring)

On 8/3/08, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: Hi all, After I moved tests in the right places (excluding IMAP), I'd like to sort out a better structure for our modules. Yeh - this has also been on my mind IMHO we have some modules that is not appropriate

[g...@vmgump]: Project james-jsieve (in module james-jsieve) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project james-jsieve has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue