Am Dienstag, den 05.08.2008, 22:00 +0100 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
> this release has been hanging around for quite a while now. norman's
> been really busy so i unless he has some time now or there are other
> volunteers, i'm willing to act as release manager for 0.2.
>
> unless anyone jumps
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 13:51, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've done some benchmarking of the recent performance improvements in trunk
vs Mime4j 0.3. I must say that the result is very promising! :)
Please let me know if my benchmarking
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project james-jsieve has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
i've run into a few problems building and staging the main site as per
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/project/trunk/HOWTO.txt
whenever i run mvn -U -Plocal,parent clean install site:stage
-DstagingDirectory=/opt/development/workspace/james-site (for
example), maven copies the content into
p
Author: rdonkin
Date: Tue Aug 5 14:29:31 2008
New Revision: 682957
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682957&view=rev
Log:
Corrected host name
Modified:
james/project/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: james/project/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/project/trunk/pom.xml?rev=68
Author: rdonkin
Date: Tue Aug 5 14:28:29 2008
New Revision: 682954
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682954&view=rev
Log:
Corrected host name
Modified:
james/project/trunk/project/pom.xml
Modified: james/project/trunk/project/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/project/trun
this release has been hanging around for quite a while now. norman's
been really busy so i unless he has some time now or there are other
volunteers, i'm willing to act as release manager for 0.2.
unless anyone jumps in now, i'll prepare a release candidate in the
next day or two. this will be the
most people know that a long standing goal of mine has been to create
independent lightweight protocol components (eg no avalon) that are
used by JAMES but can also be used by other application. i think
separate independent protocol components will have the following
benefits:
1. the quantity of c
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The issue raised in 3 different current threads, so maybe it is better to
> talk about it in a new thread.
>
> While creating more modules there is the case where we use many utility
> classes in our codebase.
>
> The cur
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> we have these packages in user-api:
>>> o.a.j.vut
>>> o.a.j.api.user
>>> o.a.j.services
>>>
>>> th
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Bernd Fondermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 18:52, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> IMHO this one (use the new structure but move some class from parser to
>> main) is the worst of the 5 analyzed, but I won't veto it, so if th
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niklas Therning ha scritto:
>>
>> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
>>>
>>> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>
> what else needs to be done before we can ship?
I'm looking here:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On 8/3/08, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
The first thing I'd like to do is to create a "server-library" (or maybe
a list
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 13:34, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I checked out postage to revamp the build and make sure it is self contained
> and build like every other product we have in the repository.
:-) Great, thanks.
> I locally updated both the ant and the m2 descri
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 18:52, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 18:07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 13:41, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
Author: bago
Date: Tue Aug 5 10:12:09 2008
New Revision: 682806
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682806&view=rev
Log:
Forgot to follow Robert suggestion to remove branches after finishing the work
in there.
Removed:
james/mime4j/branches/maven2-port/
james/mime4j/branches/repackagi
Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 18:07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 13:41, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Niklas Therning ha scritto:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Stefano Bag
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 18:07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 13:41, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Niklas Therning ha scritto:
>
> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
>>
>>>
Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 13:41, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Niklas Therning ha scritto:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
what else needs to be done before we can ship?
I'm look
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 19:40, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you know I'm working on a branch to make jSPF a multimodule product.
> It took half an hour to prepare the modules and refactor the m2 descriptor
> so to have 2 modules correctly managed by m2 but it already took a lot of
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 13:51, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've done some benchmarking of the recent performance improvements in trunk
> vs Mime4j 0.3. I must say that the result is very promising! :)
> Please let me know if my benchmarking method is flawed in any way. I'
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 13:41, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>
>> Niklas Therning ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> what else needs to be done before we can
Hi all,
In a recent commit I introduced a Base64OutputStream released from
another ASF PMC (Apache MyFaces). Should we add anything to our NOTICE?
I ask this because I happen to look at wicket main NOTICE file and I see
they made a reference to each file they copied around from other ASF
pro
Niklas Therning ha scritto:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
After your benchmark I applied the package refactoring I proposed in
MIME4J-51, so I'd like you and Oleg to try updating your client code
to see how many changes are needed and if the new structure make
sense. This is something I would avoid c
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
user-api and user-library seems almost ok as modules, but I feel the
packages are wrong.
+1
Is this something concerning also other developers or it's me too much
strict wrt packages
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Niklas Therning ha scritto:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
what else needs to be done before we can ship?
I'm looking here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:
The issue raised in 3 different current threads, so maybe it is better
to talk about it in a new thread.
While creating more modules there is the case where we use many utility
classes in our codebase.
The current ant build is by purpose organized in 4 layers:
- deployments
- functions
- libr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12619837#action_12619837
]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JSPF-65:
-
It happened again, almost identical stack (pruned t
Niklas Therning ha scritto:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
what else needs to be done before we can ship?
I'm looking here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
I see
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
what else needs to be done before we can ship?
I'm looking here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
I see 4 issues open for the 0.4 rel
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
what else needs to be done before we can ship?
I'm looking here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
I see 4 issues open for the 0.4 release:
MIME4J-57 Add a max
Niklas Therning wrote:
Hi,
I've done some benchmarking of the recent performance improvements in
trunk vs Mime4j 0.3. I must say that the result is very promising! :)
I did my tests on about 13 messages, most of them less than 10 kB
in size. All message files had been cached by the Linux
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On 8/3/08, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
Hi all,
After I moved tests in the right places (excluding IMAP), I'd like to
sort out a better structure for our modules.
Yeh - this has also been on my mind
IMHO we have so
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
34 matches
Mail list logo
