To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project james-jsieve has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
Martijn Brinkers ha scritto:
>>> Exchange 2007? Is it Exchange 2007 Server or does Exchange identify also
>>> a MUA product? I'd like to have at least another example. I wouldn't go
>>> RFC uncompliant to follow M$ proprietary solutions. If Exchange 2007 is
>> I don't think RFC2888 says something a
> > Exchange 2007? Is it Exchange 2007 Server or does Exchange identify also
> > a MUA product? I'd like to have at least another example. I wouldn't go
> > RFC uncompliant to follow M$ proprietary solutions. If Exchange 2007 is
>
> I don't think RFC2888 says something about dropping duplicate
>
> Can you name some of "Most mail clients"? In the past 10 years I used
> many different MUAs and I'm sure I've always been subscribed to at least
> one list with 2 different accounts receiving each list messages at least
> twice with the same Message-ID: in all of the MUAs I used I received
> eac
Martijn Brinkers ha scritto:
>> Yes, do you see a problem with this?
>
> That depends on the mailets you use. What if you split a message and for
> one part of the recipients you change something to the message (like add
> a header or disclaimer) and the other part you sent the message as is.
Rea
> Yes, do you see a problem with this?
That depends on the mailets you use. What if you split a message and for
one part of the recipients you change something to the message (like add
a header or disclaimer) and the other part you sent the message as is.
Currently the message that was not modifie
Martijn Brinkers ha scritto:
> But what happens with messages that are split into multiple messages (because
> of a matcher)? Do they get the same message-id?
Yes, do you see a problem with this?
It seems this also happen when your MUA sends a message to multiple
recipients on different domains.
But what happens with messages that are split into multiple messages (because
of a matcher)? Do they get the same message-id?
And what if the message has been changed in such a way that the message is no
longer similar to the original message? Should it get a new message-id when the
message con
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
I think now its time for a 2.3.2 release. Maybe before ApacheCon US ?
Cheers,
Norman
2008/10/5 Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi all,
>
> I just updated my local server to include the patch I proposed in
> JAMES-875.
>
> This basically adds this code to MimeMessageWrapper:
> -
>
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
